Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Opabinia regalis (talk | contribs) at 05:28, 25 January 2016 (→User:Brayden96 unblocked: almost done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page documents the decisions of an Arbitration Committee subcommittee. As this page is not widely watched, decisions posted here should not be discussed here; please use the committee noticeboard talk page instead. For instructions on appealing a block, see here.

Archives of this page:

2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 List of all unbans

This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

User:Brayden96 unblocked

Following a successful appeal, User:Brayden96 has been unblocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

• I've raised issues with this unblock at GorrillaWarfare's talk page before noticing this; I'm not sure this page is watched at all but I'm fine with discussion taking place wherever best suited; GW can move my talk page messages here is she wishes. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 07:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

I have a different concern, that being that BASC doesn't exist anymore, so....yea, what? Beeblebrox (talk) 19:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Bah, my understanding is that appeals opened before the dissolution of the Subcommittee are still seen through a resolution. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 19:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

If that's the case it seems a perfect example of why we got rid of BASC to begin with. Full arbcom cases are usually decided in less time. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

FYI, we are almost at the end of the remaining BASC appeals. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)