This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Visviva (talk | contribs) at 10:01, 18 August 2006 ({{Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Anime_in_the_Philippines}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:01, 18 August 2006 by Visviva (talk | contribs) ({{Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Anime_in_the_Philippines}})(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) |
| Deletion Sorting Project |
|---|
|
|
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to the Philippines. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Philippines|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to the Philippines. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Misplaced Pages's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
| Purge page cache | watch |
Articles for deletion
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Anime in the Philippines
Contested prod by Kappa. This article very much appears to be original research. Absolutely no verifiable sources has been cited. --TheFarix (Talk) 15:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- TheFarix (Talk) 15:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delte, or barring that, Delete - unless reliable sources can be found, this seems to violate WP:V WilyD 15:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete — No citations whatsoever. –- kungming·2 | 17:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete appears to be WP:OR, with now way to WP:Verify--Whpq 19:28, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Original research, no way to verify this information. –NeoChaosX (talk | contribs) 23:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ···日本穣 23:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot 00:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Don James Alto
Strong DeleteLooks like vanity; no evidence of notability provided Interestingstuffadder 18:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment it seems like he won the Under 1450 RR category at the 2006 US Open Ping Pong champianship - does anyone have the slightest clue what that is? WilyD 19:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, I misread the source, he actually won the Cadet Boys Singles - but I believe this is enough to take him past the athlete requirements in WP:BIO. Anyways, I added a reference, so he passes WP:V, at least. I see no reason to believe the article is vanity or spam, in any event. Can anyone more familiar with ping pong comment on the importance of the win? WilyD 19:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Bloke won a national championship - seems notable enough. Dev920 21:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above users. Deyyaz 04:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.