Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/WKS Śląsk Wrocław - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vanjagenije (talk | contribs) at 08:43, 24 July 2016 (Requesting additional information). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:43, 24 July 2016 by Vanjagenije (talk | contribs) (Requesting additional information)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

WKS Śląsk Wrocław

WKS Śląsk Wrocław (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/WKS Śląsk Wrocław/Archive.



23 July 2016

– An administrator or SPI clerk requires more information to determine what action to take.

Suspected sockpuppets


WKS Śląsk Wrocław won't give up farming that easily. He returned as Zugspitze2962 (talk · contribs) this time to promote his friggin hometown by edit warring with everybody, yet again:

  1. warned
  2. revert
  3. revert
  4. revert Poeticbent talk 20:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed - @Poeticbent: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Categories: