This is an old revision of this page, as edited by David J Wilson (talk | contribs) at 13:08, 7 September 2016 (→top: — the proposed translation from French Misplaced Pages was rejected. None of it remains in the article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:08, 7 September 2016 by David J Wilson (talk | contribs) (→top: — the proposed translation from French Misplaced Pages was rejected. None of it remains in the article)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mathematics in the medieval Islamic world article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 4 months |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mathematics in the medieval Islamic world article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 4 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
To-do list for Mathematics in the medieval Islamic world: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2022-09-17
|
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Discussion required
There appears to be something of an edit-war in progress in this article. Could both sides please pause with the editing of the disputed passages, and discuss the situation here, civilly, stating clearly the case for both sides, with suitable sources, and we can arrive at a reasoned consensus by one means or another. Only then can we sensibly update the article. Thank you all in advance for your co-operation. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Categories: