This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ikip (talk | contribs) at 04:14, 8 September 2006 (→Another liberal is pushed out of wikipedia: ==Another liberal is pushed out of wikipedia==). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:14, 8 September 2006 by Ikip (talk | contribs) (→Another liberal is pushed out of wikipedia: ==Another liberal is pushed out of wikipedia==)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Another liberal is pushed out of wikipedia
Another liberal is pushed out of wikipedia, first User_talk:Ruy_Lopez and now you. You have made up your mind, just like all the other cats have, so this plea to User_talk:Ruy_Lopez will probably fall on deaf ears: User_talk:Ruy_Lopez#Giving_up_is_the_wrong_thing_to_do You do have allies here Rootology, we just are not as conformist and walk lock step as the "vast right wing conspiracy". I think I suggested an advocate? Did you get an advocate? Is there anything I can do to help? You can email me if you like, I can help you. I have gone up against more intellegent and crafty wikipedians than you are fighting with now, and succeeded, repeatedly.
Putting "no apology" on someone else's user page is letting others win, trust me, I have been blocked for putting a comment 1000 times worse on User:CJK's page. It was stupid, and I apologized, repeatedly. The irony is, that User:CJK and I are kind of friends now. Or at least we don't write things on each other's page like you just did. :)
Apologize to the users you offended when you are unblocked. Erase your comments. Move on. If you can't move on because wikipedians are stopping you from moving on, find people who can help you roll over or go around these wikipedians.
Or you can be a cats. Look were it got User_talk:Ruy_Lopez.
Do you have an email address? I can send you an encyclopediadramatica site which will lighten your mood. Travb (talk) 16:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter, Fred Bauder, is getting me perma banned from WP. rootology (T) 16:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Dude, don't go on a sucide mission. Calm down. Quit being a cat. Travb (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
I did what I could
I did what I could, I changed the tone of the arbitration as much as I could.
I would pursue: User_talk:Fred_Bauder#What_exactly_is_.22excessive_zeal.22_Fred.3F
I would also push for the entire Arbitration to scrapped and be rewritten by a non-partisan admin, or enlist other more sympathetic and neutral admins to support your cause. You can't fight a lawyer admin and a season admin POV warrior without help.
I would also investigate whether Fred and Mongo have worked together with each other before. Mongo states he never has.
Stay on topic, don't let Mongo or any one else change the topic, and muddy the issue.
Quote wikipedia policy liberally as these admins do.
Don't call anyone names, don't say their is some cabal. That was stupid on your part today. Even if the things you say are true, PC (politcal correctness) rules on wikipedia. No one wants to talk about the big picture and no one cares, especially when these admins are enjoying the fruits of the system. It doesn't matter how flawed the system is. You have to work within the system. Bringing up Jimmy is stupid, it will only galvanize your wikipedia opponents, and alienate potential wikipedia allies.
Anyway, I am unwatching the page, if you need more help, let me know.
I ask sea to come and comment on the page. I would suggest you actively BUT in a neutral tone encourage others to comment on this page. If you need the wikipolicy which permits this, please let me know.
Get an advocate, as I suggested before.
You are up a creek right now without a paddle. I can't remedy your bad behavior before, I can only suggest ways you can mediate the consequences of your poor decisions. Travb (talk) 04:14, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
I'm picking up a vibe that you might not much care, but for what it's worth I've blocked you for 24 hours for a series of personal attacks, especially . —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 16:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter, really, at this point. The truth is coming in a major way (lets just say the press is already looking in the right places thanks to the right leaks from the right "people" with extra buttons). Better tell Jumbo or the communications commitee. rootology (T) 16:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- And by press I sure don't mean Wikitruth, review, et al. Think contacts at starts "Real" ends with "Media". rootology (T) 16:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Birdshooter?
Hi. This edit summary is completely inappropriate. If you are under stress, you should walk away from the keyboard until you're clear-headed again. William Pietri 16:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- You're right. rootology (T) 16:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Remove harassment links
Kindly remove the harassment links to the articles at ED. Thanks.--MONGO 16:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Your talk page is protected to keep you from attacking Wikipedians. If you wish to be unblocked, email any admin.--MONGO 16:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)