Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JoshDonaldson20 (talk | contribs) at 15:31, 15 December 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Air superiority fighter" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

An air superiority fighter, also spelled air-superiority fighter, is a type of fighter aircraft designed for entering and seizing control of enemy airspace as a means of establishing complete dominance over the enemy's air force (air supremacy). Air superiority fighters are designed primarily to effectively engage enemy fighters, more than other types of aircraft, although some may have a secondary role for air-to-ground strikes. They are usually more expensive and procured in smaller numbers, compared to multirole fighters which are designed with a balance between air-to-air and air-to-ground capabilities.

In order to maximize their combat effectiveness and strategic usefulness, air superiority fighters usually operate under the control/co-ordination of an airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft.

Evolution of the term

During World War II and through the Korean War, fighters were classified by their role: heavy fighter, interceptor, escort fighter, night fighter, and so forth. With the development of guided missiles in the 1950s, design diverged between fighters optimized to fight in the beyond visual range (BVR) regime (interceptors), and fighters optimized to fight in the within visual range (WVR) regime (air superiority fighters). In the United States, the influential proponents of BVR developed fighters with no forward-firing gun, such as the original F-4 Phantom II, as it was thought that they would never need to resort to WVR combat. These aircraft would sacrifice high maneuverability, and instead focus on remaining performance characteristics, as they presumably would never engage in a dogfight with enemy fighters.

Lessons in combat

Combat experiences during the Vietnam War proved BVR proponents wrong. Owing to restrictive rules of engagement and the failings of 1960s missile and radar technology, air combat often devolved into close-range dogfights, one for which American fighters and pilots were unprepared. The lessons from this conflict spurred a rethinking of design priorities for fighter aircraft, in which the U.S. Navy's TOPGUN and the U.S. Air Force's Red Flag programs, developed specifically to teach pilots the lessons of dogfighting, were created.

The first air superiority fighters

After lessons learned from combat experiences involving modern military air capacity, the U.S. Navy's VFAX/VFX and U.S. Air Force's F-X (Fighter Experimental) reassessed their tactical direction which resulted in the U.S. Navy's F-14 Tomcat and US Air Force's F-15 Eagle. The two designs were built to achieve air superiority and significant consideration was given during the development of both aircraft to allow them to excel at the shorter ranges of fighter combat. Both aircraft also serve as interceptors due to their high maximum speed.

By contrast, the Soviets (and the succeeding Russian Federation) developed and continue to operate separate types of air superiority (MiG-29, Su-27) and interceptor (MiG-25, MiG-31) fighters.

Evolution of secondary ground-attack capability

For the US Navy, the F-14 Tomcat was initially deployed solely as an air superiority fighter (plus fleet defense interceptor and tactical aerial reconnaissance). By contrast, the multirole F/A-18 Hornet was designed as strike fighter while having only enough of an edge to defend itself against enemy fighters if needed. While the F-14 had an undeveloped secondary ground attack capability (with a Stores Management System (SMS) that included air-to-ground options as well as rudimentary software in the AWG-9), the Navy did not want to risk it in the air-to-ground role at the time, due to its lack of proper defensive electronic countermeasures (DECM) and radar homing and warning (RHAW) for overland operations, as well as the fighter's high cost. In the 1990s, the US Navy added LANTIRN pods to its F-14s and deployed them on precision ground-attack missions.

The F-15 Eagle was envisioned originally as an air superiority fighter and interceptor under the mantra "not a pound for air-to-ground". However, the F-15C can carry "dumb" and GPS guided bombs, such capabilities which were first used by Israeli Air Force. In fact, the basic airframe proved versatile enough to produce a very capable strike fighter, the F-15E Strike Eagle, while designed for ground attack, retains the air-to-air lethality of the original F-15. The F-16 Fighting Falcon was originally designed as an air superiority fighter but has evolved into a successful all-weather multirole aircraft.

1990s to present

Since the 1990s, with air superiority fighters such as the F-14 and F-15 pressed into the strike role and/or having a strike derivative, the lines between air superiority fighters and multirole fighters has blurred somewhat.

The Eurofighter Typhoon and Dassault Rafale are classified as multirole fighters; however the Typhoon is also considered an air superiority fighter while the Rafale is not. The Typhoon is more effective at air-to-air combat including first look first kill and beyond visual range encounters, and despite a built-in ground attack capability it has a relatively light payload compared to its contemporaries. The Rafale is regarded as a more balanced design which sacrifices air-to-air ability for being able to carry more ordinance.

With the retirement of the F-14 Tomcat, the US Navy has pressed its F/A-18 Hornet and its upsized derivative, the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, into the air superiority role, despite the Hornets being originally designed as multirole strike fighters.

Examples

• Eurofighter Typhoon
• Grumman F-14 Tomcat
• McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle
• Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor
• Mikoyan MiG-29 Fulcrum (including derivatives MiG-29M and Mikoyan MiG-29K)
• Sukhoi Su-27 (including derivatives Sukhoi Su-30, Sukhoi Su-33, and Sukhoi Su-35)
• Shenyang J-11
• Shenyang J-15

See also

• Interceptor aircraft
• Fighter aircraft

Notes

1. Davies, Steve. (2005). F-15C Eagle Units in Combat. Osprey Publishing Ltd. pp. 6-9. ISBN 978-1-84176-730-7.
2. Spick, Mike. (1985). Modern Fighting Aircraft: F-14. Arco Publishing Inc. p. 8. ISBN 0-668-06406-4.
3. Gillcrist, Paul T. (1994). Tomcat! The Grumman F-14 Story. Schiffer Publishing Ltd. pp. 10, 195. ISBN 0-88740-664-5 .
4. "F-14 Tomcat fighter fact file." United States Navy, 5 July 2003. Retrieved: 20 January 2007.
5. Hallion, Dr. Richard P. "A Troubling Past: Air Force Fighter Acquisition since 1945." Airpower Journal, Winter 1990. Retrieved: 1 September 2011.
6. Jenkins 1998, pp. 35–36.

External links

• Glossary of Nato Definitions
• Rand: Revival of the Air-Superiority Fighter

• Fighter aircraft