Misplaced Pages

User talk:WordSeventeen/Archive 5

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:WordSeventeen

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WordSeventeen (talk | contribs) at 23:55, 23 May 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:55, 23 May 2015 by WordSeventeen (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

complaints

Just so you know, this editor has just disclosed as a paid editor. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Also, I am assuming good faith, I'm working fully within the Misplaced Pages guidelines. I strongly believed that the articles were not fit for Misplaced Pages. I respect your decision to decline the speedy deletion tags, even though I do not agree with you. Joseph2302 (talk)
I know what the status of the editor is because I am the one that asked him about it. I see that you have gone ahead and put both of the editor's created articles up for AFD which is fine if that is what you prefer. But what is not fine is that you have serially gutted both articles after putting them up for AFD. See here and here: Please really you should let the other editors see the article so they can give discussion on the articles. You really should self-revert all those troublesome gutting excisions on Cody Sipe and Daniel M. Ritchie before someone else does. Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 23:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP says that unsourced content on BLP is a BLP violation, and should be removed. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:39, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Of course that is the policy, but what you have done is serially gut the articles AFTER you put them up for AFD. Not a good practice. If one were not assuming good faith there might be some severe conclusions drawn about your disruptive behaviour. Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 23:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)== Speedy deletion ==

Users Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) and VQuakr (talk · contribs) noted that you recently nominated a number of articles for speedy deletion on the basis of Misplaced Pages:Criteria for speedy deletion#A7. These include Grumpyface Studios, Suncore Photovoltaics, Angela Black, Jessica Shirvington, Nesskip and Kveldúlfur, all of which had a credible claim of significance. Before you nominate any more articles for speedy deletion I advise you to carefully review the criteria and make sure you fully understand the principles. Further inappropriate nominations may be considered disruptive and may result in blocks. Thank you, Aymatth2 (talk) 21:36, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hugo Barra

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hugo Barra. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletions

Since when does a company stub which says "one of the largest shipping companies in Iceland" not assert notability? Nesskip is one of the largest bulk/oil transporters in Iceland and should not have been missing. Would you like to speedy delete the rest of the new entries at WP:Intertranswiki? Please Google search something before you slop hasty speedy tags on articles within 5 minutes of creation and make a judgement.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:08, 23 May 2015 (UTC)