This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.205.65.85 (talk) at 18:39, 19 September 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:39, 19 September 2006 by 24.205.65.85 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)possible copyvio
A lot of the text seems to be taken directly from the band's history page on their website. I think that the page can be edited so as to be okay, but I checked out the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems which say that you should blank the page and put up a copyvio notice...? Not sure what to do here - I'm going to wait a day or so and see if anyone has any ideas. Cantara 19:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
What's your concern? The text was ok'd by the band to be presented here on Misplaced Pages.
Okay then. I wasn't aware of that. Perhaps mention of this should be made somewhere on the page, e.g. some text courtesy of LAM, can also be found . Also, would you mind signing your messages? It's a little annoying to have to look at the history to see who left me a note. Thanks! Cantara 20:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
the reason the text seems similar to the website text is because the entry was created by a member of the band. so no "courtesy of" would be necessary as the same individual wrote both things.
- Actually the guy who does the web work for LAM wrote that article which was used with permission.
blipblip
not exactly npov
what are adjectives like "funny" and "touching" doing in what's supposed to be an encyclopedic article? this reads like a fan's praise rather than a fact-based, informative article. -supine 07:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
I edited out the biased stuff.