This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kappa (talk | contribs) at 02:49, 26 September 2006 (please help). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:49, 26 September 2006 by Kappa (talk | contribs) (please help)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)A welcome from Sango123
Hello, LisaSastro, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
- Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
- The Five Pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Simplified Ruleset
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Misplaced Pages Glossary
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Misplaced Pages is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Happy editing!
–Sango123 (e) 23:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)
Article listed for deletion
Hi Lisa,
I noticed from the Inclusionist category page that you're an inclusionist, too, so I was wondering if you would be able to do me a huge favor and possibly place a vote here: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Embarazada. I added a ton to it, citing my sources. If you could, I would be greatly in your debt.
Best wishes,
Primetime 21:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, Lisa.--Primetime 02:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now
Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Category: