This is an old revision of this page, as edited by QuackGuru (talk | contribs) at 14:06, 17 May 2017 (Edit warring again?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:06, 17 May 2017 by QuackGuru (talk | contribs) (Edit warring again?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|---|
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Luger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Juul (electronic cigarette) merge
The content was merged without the unsourced text and unreliable sources. Thanks QuackGuru (talk) 03:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- I sorry I do not agree with this merge there are plenty of reliable sources. Valoem 04:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- You restored unreliable sources and unsourced content. Please read the section below. QuackGuru (talk) 04:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Where? Also thanks for letting me know something I wrote was bold merge., I'll replace again source if needed, but I'm not see anything issues. Valoem 04:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- You didn't notice any problem with this edit? QuackGuru (talk) 04:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- It appears advert Emilynorelll (talk · contribs) vandalized the article I restored the original version I wrote. Valoem 05:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- I tagged the spam you accidently restored. QuackGuru (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Okay we can start a formal merge process. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- I tagged the spam you accidently restored. QuackGuru (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- It appears advert Emilynorelll (talk · contribs) vandalized the article I restored the original version I wrote. Valoem 05:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- You didn't notice any problem with this edit? QuackGuru (talk) 04:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Where? Also thanks for letting me know something I wrote was bold merge., I'll replace again source if needed, but I'm not see anything issues. Valoem 04:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- You restored unreliable sources and unsourced content. Please read the section below. QuackGuru (talk) 04:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
DS alert
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Electronic cigarette topic area, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 QuackGuru (talk) 04:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Koren Specific Technique
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. QuackGuru (talk) 14:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)