This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PKtm (talk | contribs) at 06:29, 6 October 2006 (Is anyone paying attention to these guidelines?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:29, 6 October 2006 by PKtm (talk | contribs) (Is anyone paying attention to these guidelines?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Name suffix
Regarding whether to append the words (Lost) or {Lost episode) to each article title, I can see using either one, but I thought I'd start some discussion here in case anyone wants to offer an opinion. The way that the Star Trek episodes seem to handle it, is definitely with the "episode" style, as is seen at Category:Star Trek episodes. --Elonka 18:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Is anyone paying attention to these guidelines?
See A Tale of Two Cities (Lost). I see no (or very few) edits/reverts that are in the spirit of keeping to these guidelines. The plot section is currently exceeding 2,100 words, including trivia. Almost every tenet is violated from these guidelines, in fact. Trivia is in there that is pure original research. Dialog is included at many junctures. Virtually every scene of the show is described in detail.
Obviously, I could set about fixing any or all of this, but I'm puzzled as to why others don't seem to be jumping in. Did the mediation matter? Are others not committed to these guidelines? Elonka? Wikipedical? ArgentiumOutlaw? Thanks, PKtm 06:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)