Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lil Flip246 (talk | contribs) at 21:31, 24 October 2006 (Username). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Longhair/Archive12. Sections without timestamps are not archived
/Archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Advice for a newbie...

Longhair, can you tell me either how to make subsidiary pages within a page (i.e. in a discussion page, creating an archive page; or in a user page, making sub-pages) or where I can find this info? Tried with no luck User:MojoTas

"Medatition"

Thanks for the encouragement. I suspect that this is Nathan. I think he means well, but needs to learn more about working with other people. On the brighter side, I think he's helped WikiCats and I to find some common ground :-) --Scott Davis 14:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

No worries. We all live by our reputations here. --Scott Davis 08:10, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Foreign language citation

Could you give us a hand in a discussion about whether citations to original texts in German need to be translated for editors who cannot read German? Hgilbert 15:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

The question is whether, to support the contested fact that Steiner wrote a series of articles in a particular journal, the German-language complete works of Steiner where these articles appear (with references that show their original publication) can be cited in a Misplaced Pages footnote. Or is it impossible to show (give verifiable proof) that these articles exist merely because they were written in German? Note: this has nothing to do with the link discussion I see on your talk page below. Hgilbert 10:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Arabiation Request Filed

I filed a arabition request. Thanks 4 your help. Nathannoblet 06:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Can you look at this?

Could you look at this edit by User P.K.? Thanks, --Thebee 08:10, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Can you look at a follow up question at my page, Longhair? Thanks. Thebee 00:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I explained the edit. You guys are playing link wars again - why not stop it while the Waldorf Project team is deciding this issue? I'm inclined to delete ALL the external links and let the project team put back what they have determined belong there - especially if it will hold off another edit war and avoid getting the article locked up again. Pete K 20:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

"You guys are playing link wars again" On 17:20, 18 October 2006, you started playing a link edit war of the Waldorf article by removing links from the External links section, after noone had done anything with the section (except a small addition on 12 October 2006) since Longhair unprotected the page on 28 September, three weeks earlier.

Maybe you should consider correcting your description of reality, and stop playing games with Longhair and others. Thebee 00:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, but I've got my hands full correcting YOUR description of reality. Pete K 02:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

This guy is back

This guy was suspended for vandalism - and he's back at it again.

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Rudolf_Steiner&diff=83333574&oldid=83331644

Thank you

Thanks for voting and commenting for me in my RfA last month. I'll try again as previously planned in the late of spring, and hopefully I'll win it. I sure learned my lesson on a fair use image misplacement!! When I get off Wikibreak I'll start visting xfD everyday. Do you have any tips or suggestions for me? Thanks again, X (SUPERDESK|Help me improve) 07:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Talk spam

I don't want to be accused of being a spammer, but it would seem fair to me to spam a note about the requested move of Global city to everyone who !voted on the (withdrawn) AfD. Comments? — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 18:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Article Emmalina restoration

I restored the article per discussion on ]

Emmalina has passed the initial 1st AfD. This article should be temporary restored maybe for a 4th nomination, until a general consensus can be reached. Valoem 20:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh ok, I was just preparing a recreate if http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Notable_YouTube_memes fails AfD and is deleted. Valoem 20:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Username

Hey. I was wondering how I could change my username?? Lil Flip246 21:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)