This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yellow Diamond (talk | contribs) at 22:06, 3 November 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:06, 3 November 2018 by Yellow Diamond (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hàn-jī
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Hàn-jī (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not actually a distinct writing system, it's just Chinese characters (with some unique ones, but it's still not as distinct as, say, Chu Nom. Not notable, google search returned nothing, couldn't find an indication of topic's notability from a brief search of scholarly database. Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 04:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 07:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- redirect to Written Hokkien which covers the use of Chinese for Hokkien much more fully with sources.--JohnBlackburnedeeds 13:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure if it would be better to redirect there, or maybe redirect to Chinese characters, seeing as that's what Han-ji means. Should the Hokkien for Chinese characters redirect to Hokkien writing, or Chinese characters? I'm not sure we need it at all. --Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 22:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)