Misplaced Pages

:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Colin (talk | contribs) at 23:08, 9 November 2006 (Initial version containing text directly lifted from WP:MEDMOS). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:08, 9 November 2006 by Colin (talk | contribs) (Initial version containing text directly lifted from WP:MEDMOS)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
See also: Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources.

In general, Misplaced Pages articles should rely on reliable secondary sources. Good secondary sources are, for example, medicine textbooks.

If the latest research findings arrived in your post-box today, great! But as you add them to an article make sure they are supported by background content. You might also want to consider waiting until other researchers have confirmed it, or it is integrated in review articles or medical books. If desired, you can broadly signify a trend without endeavouring to keep the reference list completely up-to-date with the very latest studies.

Ideally every medical article should have

  • a few historical references (e.g. first reported case, discovery of pathogenesis)
  • one or two recent systematic reviews in core journals (like Nature, Science, Cell,...).
  • Textbooks are important as secondary sources.
  • Some databases (like OMIM or eMedicine) provide in-depth peer-reviewed information (but remember, nobody's perfect).

Ideally any online reference will be to an open sites that do not restrict access to non-professionals or require a subscription. Template:PMC (see below) may be very helpful to this end.

  • References - are sources used as background to a whole topic and should be included as a bulleted list (start each line with an asterisk '*'). Citation details may be manually formatted, but the use of generic citation templates helps standardise their appearance.
  • Footnotes - are sources provided to expand or verify specific details in the text. The same manual or template formating of citation details is used, but additional markup is needed to generate the footnote numbered links (e.g. ). WP:Footnotes describes cite.php, the latest of several methods, as summarised below.

Good online resources