This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aoi (talk | contribs) at 21:48, 6 October 2019 (Warning: Three-revert rule on Cultural impact of Michael Jackson. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:48, 6 October 2019 by Aoi (talk | contribs) (Warning: Three-revert rule on Cultural impact of Michael Jackson. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is Owynhart's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes for 90 days, after which you can request permanent extension of the right. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Misplaced Pages:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Misplaced Pages:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Misplaced Pages:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Chetsford (talk) 15:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
Your recent editing history at Cultural impact of Michael Jackson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Aoi (青い) (talk) 21:48, 6 October 2019 (UTC)