This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Docu (talk | contribs) at 03:18, 12 December 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:18, 12 December 2006 by Docu (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Chriscf, what problem do you have with the article? It's not the only sports event in 2009 with an article.
Is there an event you would like to write about? Maybe I can assist you. Please start the article and I will look into it. -- User:Docu
- WP:NOT#CBALL and WP:INN already say all there is to say about this. As I said, if there was any actual content in this article, I might see things differently. My problem is not with the existence of the article, it's with the existence of articles on far-future events right now. Why do we need an article on the 2011 event right now? Chris cheese whine 21:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Would you go through WP:NOT#CBALL and confirm which points you feel apply here? -- User:Docu
- I refer the honorable member to the answer I gave some moments ago. Chris cheese whine 02:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Would you go through WP:NOT#CBALL and confirm which points you feel apply here? -- User:Docu
- If there is an article you would like to start, I'd be glad to help. -- User:Docu
- I have explained already. As there is no clear explanation for your restoration of a zero-content article, please don't put it back, and please don't patronise. Chris cheese whine 03:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- If there is an article you would like to start, I'd be glad to help. -- User:Docu
- It's an event that would merit an article if it had already occurred. The elements in the article aren't speculative in nature. Besides, there are already four other language version of the article. Unfortunately your general reference to "WP:NOT#CBALL and WP:INN" and 2011. Please explain what you mean. -- User:Docu