This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mathchem271828 (talk | contribs) at 16:38, 12 December 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:38, 12 December 2006 by Mathchem271828 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now
Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Henry F. Schaefer, III
I want to make it clear to any one who might browse my talk page that I had nothing to do with the current status of that page. I tried to put it back to where it was about the science and failed because other users wanted to make it about religion and ID, which obviously aren't science.
Your eforts on the Schaefer page missed me as I was busy doing other things and anyway I am on the other side of the world and do things at different times. I was in the Schaefer group in 1990 on sabbatical and collaborated with him for several years after that. I think I have published 9 papers with him. I respect his science greatly and do not agree with him in any respect on religion. Please e-mail me from my user page and let us talk about him off wiki for a while. It is too late at night here now for more. --Bduke 11:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Sure that'd be great. --mathchem271828