Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OrphanBot (talk | contribs) at 05:07, 21 December 2006 (Problem with fairuse image upload). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Since I am an admin, you can and should track all of my actions. This is my desk, where you can check all this stuff out. Blocks I've handed out Stuff I've deleted Pages I've protected

Leave me a message

No barnstars please.

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11

Thank you soo much

Thank you for your kind welcome message. I was affraid that my additions were unwelcome as many users have been un-profanely attacking me. I will continue to add my knowlege in an un-biased fasion to various Misplaced Pages pages. I promise to maintain compliance and only add secondarily sourceable material and otherwise independantly verifiable information. It pleases me to take part in the Misplaced Pages project.

??

Any particular reason why my entry was deleted while I was editing it? It seems EN World, also a D20/D&D website is special enough to have it's own Misplaced Pages entry but Realms of Evil which is older is not?

Sysop access restored

Hi. Having verified that your desysopping was voluntary and that there were no controverted circumstances involved, and in view of your request via email to me, I have restored your sysop access. Cheers, Redux 13:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

A 62 hour desysopping, that must be a record for a voluntary request. I think you should pay an Early change of mind penalty ;). NoSeptember 14:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree. Shame on you. _{BOSTON SUCKS!} - crz crztalk 14:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm just such a lavish person person and my urges must be controled. :) Yanksox 14:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

You are an admin still? This is great. But then again – Aw man! I wanted to take part in the record breaking RfA by piling on. That would have spectacular! ;-) JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 18:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

LOL! Err, I was resysoped, but I'll try to do my best, heh. Yanksox 19:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Back already? a'right, you're getting blocked again for not taking a proper wikibreak. I think a week is appropriate. Or maybe a month. btw, wanted to make sure you saw this. Thanks again, my friend.Kchase T 19:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

W00t! And here I was afraid we were Yanksoxless. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 20:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/W00t - crz crztalk 20:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Heh. God forbid that should ever happen. :) Yanksox 20:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Crz's world?? :) - crz crztalk 20:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Help me mr yanksox

my article seems not appear like other submitted articles.. can you help me find the error?..

Thank you very much —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aziyamarcee (talk • contribs) 16:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC).

• I would like to request some assistance with my ISkin article, which has been marked for deletion. Unfortunately, I am still familiarizing myself with article creation on Misplaced Pages and would like to ask for a bit more time to gather my data for the article. Any advice or help you could offer would be greatly appreciated! Dazednconfused693 22:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Wendy Alane Wright

Wendy Alane Wright credits and facts can be VERIFIED at the following websites:

http://www.discogs.com/artist/Wendy+Wright

http://www.popinstituut.nl/biografie/def_la_desh___the_fresh_witness.13954.html

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2397715/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wendyalane (talk • contribs)

I meet 2 of these categories:

1. Has had a charted hit on any national music chart. YES I HAVE.

1. Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network. FEEL THE RHYTHM WAS IN ROTATION NATIONALLY.

ALSO, I HAVE REACHED A LEVEL OF NOTABILITY IN THE DUTCH MUSIC ENCYCLOPEDIA. MY EXISTENCE BY THIS OUTSIDE SOURCE CAN BE VERIFIED: http://www.popinstituut.nl/biografie/def_la_desh___the_fresh_witness.13954.html

ALSO THE RECORD I WROTE AND SANG ON "FEEL GOOD" WENT GOLD IN SCANDINAVIA AND HOLLAND.

wendy Wendyalane 21:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Harry Potter characters birthday list

Where do you get off deleting and article that has 5 comments saying delete out of 19 total with the rest supporting a merge or keep? John Reaves 22:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

If your conclusion was that stuff was already merged, you should have closed it as redirect to preserve the history. - crz crztalk 22:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

There wasn't anything to merge, it's a list of names and dates. I'll restore and redirect. Yanksox 22:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

It's the format of the list that was useful. Will the prior versions still be accessible? John Reaves 23:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Restore = Restoration of entire history. Yanksox 23:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, and consider the consensus next time. John Reaves 23:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh, sorry for intimidating you. I'm not "hiding under numbers", I just assumed that you hadn't read he AfD since you deleted instead doing what the majority said, and redirecting. Please don't arbitrarily delete articles based on you opinion of the article instead of the clear-cut consensus of the AfD. John Reaves 23:26, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. John Reaves 23:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

De Cordova image

Thanks for adding a badly needed image to the Frederick De Cordova article. I saw images on the internet, but had no idea what hurdles had to be lept through to use one, because of all the copvio stuff. Edison 23:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Sources

Of course, but they're frustrating when Web sites go down or articles are removed from the site. Just for my own info -- when an article from a reliable source appears to have been removed for good, does that mean that the detail is no longer verifiable and should be removed from an article? My gut is no, the item was still sourced by the article accessed on such-and-such date, just as something in print or in other electronic media wouldn't be Web-accessible. But I'd like to get an "official" take on that topic. (And then if you have time left over you can tell me if my take on WINAD is all wrong. :-P) - PhilipR 06:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Arthur Mattuck on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Arthur Mattuck. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Hornplease 06:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Email reply

Since my email seems to not want to send my message (though last time someone emailed me and I thought it hadn't sent my reply, it did, so we'll see), I figured I'd just C&P my response here:

I really, really, really appreciate the kind words. I love simply editing WP, and I certainly don't do so in a quest for acclaim or increased self-esteem, but it's also nice to know that others recognize your contributions.

Honestly is a tough thing- I do feel that it's the "best policy," but it can get you into trouble. I'm proud to say that I don't pull punches, and I wouldn't want people pulling them with me- if you think I've screwed up, call me out on it!

I love 'Deis. It's going to be tough leaving- especially when I have to enter the "real world," which I absolutely do not want to do. But, of course, all good things must come to an end. -- Kicking222 19:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

AC/DC Article

The links on that page have been the subject of a long, ongoing discussion of which I don't recall you previously being a part of. Many months ago an administrator named SooTHING had to step in and make a ruling on what would and would not be included in the links. That ruling was accepted by all the parties involved. However, sometime within the last 2 months, SooTHING's decision was anonymously removed from the AC/DC talk page and the edit warring began again. Please don't make it worse than it is by adding fuel to the fire of the anonymous vandals on that page. NCC17 21:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Awesome

I wish I had a dollar for every article that I've {{speedy}} tagged with the word "awesome" in the text!!--Anthony.bradbury 21:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

w00t

I agree with your definition of w00t, but it needs a source. If that slang page isn't kept strictly enforced, it quickly becomes unmanagable. --Onorem 22:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

wOOt? Is that something you say when you visit the local Hooters? ;-) JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 02:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Heh, we'll need sources on that one. :P Yanksox 02:43, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. More research... JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 02:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 18th.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

• Administrators open to recall
• Rouge admins