Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Launebee/Archive - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations | Launebee

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sro23 (talk | contribs) at 03:43, 20 January 2018 (Archiving case from Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Launebee). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:43, 20 January 2018 by Sro23 (talk | contribs) (Archiving case from Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Launebee)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Launebee

Launebee (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

13 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Evidence: User:Launebee twice removed some tags from the article Panthéon-Assas University. Another user, User:‪XIIIfromTOKYO‬, twice restored them. Then immediately a series of four IPs did the identical removals that Launebee had been doing, while the other user reverted the IPs and mocked them as socks. I am requesting a Checkuser because I think it is possible that this was a joe job against Launebee - not only because it is way, way too obvious, but because the IPs geolocate to Europe and the other user appears (despite their name) to be European.

The situation is actually seen most clearly at Panthéon-Assas University: Revision history but here are the diffs:

  • Launebee and
  • 129.102.254.237
  • 89.185.246.17
  • 89.185.246.13 and
  • 89.185.246.34

Thanks for checking. (And yes, the edit warring is being dealt with elsewhere.) MelanieN (talk) 23:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Comment about not connecting user accounts with IP addresses: Yes, I know you can't connect an account to a unique IP that is theirs. But I thought it might be possible to check and see if one or the other user I have named here is socking, without specifying which IP (out of four IPs from two completely different ranges) actually connects to the user. --MelanieN (talk) 23:48, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

19 January 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Some of the users that defend the articles University of Paris and Sorbonne University current versions seem to be either anonymous IPs or recently created accounts that support one another’s views in the discussion thread, creating a illusion of support. Their verbatim, including English mistakes (“reborn” instead of “rebirth” and so on), are also similar.

I have recently seen that the user Launabee was banned from making edits on French academic institutionsUser_talk:Launebee#Topic_ban. Since then, the following users were created, perhaps in a way of evading his sanction: 


Launebee (Last edit: 23/10/17) 
Parberg (First edit: 7/11/17. Last edit: 21/11/17
) JeanBirkin (First edit: 18/12/17. Last edit: 23/12/17) SummertimeinCrocodilopolis (First edit: 27/12/17. Last edit: 12/01/17).



As one can see, the users were created exclusively to support a similar POV regarding the University of Paris and Sorbonne University. The edits of all the above mentioned users are in identical articles, all concerning Parisian universities, with a similar agenda. Moreover, the date of the creation of their accounts is suspicious. On top of that, all the users seem to have considerable knowledge regarding wikipedia already from their first contribution.



I don't want to make false accusations here, I would be deeply sorry to make a mistake, but perhaps a more experienced user could have a look on what is going on in these pages. SirJamesMcBiscuit (talk) 21:24, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments