This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fowler&fowler (talk | contribs) at 22:54, 4 January 2007 (→Apologies). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:54, 4 January 2007 by Fowler&fowler (talk | contribs) (→Apologies)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)--nids 23:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC) nidhish
 Archives |
|---|
Welcome!
- user talk:Nidhishsinghal/Archive 1: July 2006 – August 2006
- user talk:Nidhishsinghal/Archive 2: September 2006 - Dec 2006
Please lets discuss the Hindu creationism article
Why is it crap to you? Lets discuss it. Some of the introduction etc was mangled so I agree that reads poorly now. what is wrong with the rest of it though? Is there no Hindu creationism movement? Were there not books written on Hindu creation that attempted to disprove evolution? Was there not a state department report on textbooks in India? was there not a huge lawsuit in california about changing textbooks to suit Hindu sensibilities?--Filll 19:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- You have to help me here. I am not Indian. I do not even play one on TV. I am not Muslim. I am a complete outsider, and I had never even heard of antiDarwin sentiments among Hindus until I did a little bit of looking, and found a huge hornet's nest.--Filll 19:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- I say AFD, Hinduism is one of the more silent religions on creation. Nobleeagle 22:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Apologies
Many apologies for my outburst in one of the edit summaries on the Indus Valley Civilization page. It wasn't directed at anyone or any group. I was stressed and got frustrated. I hope you understand. Again, many apologies. Regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 22:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)