Misplaced Pages

28 November 2006

• 06:1106:11, 28 November 2006 diff hist −35,754 Jews for Jesus if we can't have a simple 'totallydisputed' template, this is the next best thing . . .
• 06:0506:05, 28 November 2006 diff hist −35,754 Jews for Jesus removing pov commentary is not vandalism. i am correcting vandalism here.
• 05:5805:58, 28 November 2006 diff hist −35,754 Jews for Jesus do not rv without cause. we need some npov info. here.
• 05:5005:50, 28 November 2006 diff hist −35,806 Jews for Jesus my original version; still the best, or at least, the fairest . . .
• 05:4505:45, 28 November 2006 diff hist +23 Jews for Jesus No edit summary

22 November 2006

• 09:1609:16, 22 November 2006 diff hist +23 Jews for Jesus no . . . dear god, i don't. what a waste of time.
• 08:3608:36, 22 November 2006 diff hist +23 Jews for Jesus the only thing going on "ad infinitum" is this outrageous attempt by fundamentalists to make this page into a font for religious propaganda . . .

21 November 2006

• 09:1009:10, 21 November 2006 diff hist +11 Jews for Jesus what? we have consensus on this point. god, this website is ridiculous . . .
• 06:3806:38, 21 November 2006 diff hist +11 Jews for Jesus rm lie
• 03:4703:47, 21 November 2006 diff hist +32 Jews for Jesus don't remove the tag. we have been over this ad infinitum. see the talk page, my talk page, and mediation. jesus.

17 November 2006

• 22:4122:41, 17 November 2006 diff hist +26 Jews for Jesus see the talk page, see the mediation page. it is totally disputed.

16 November 2006

• 07:3407:34, 16 November 2006 diff hist +21 Jews for Jesus see the talk page, see the mediation page. it is totally disputed.
• 00:1600:16, 16 November 2006 diff hist −129 Jews for Jesus see the talk page, see the mediation page. it is totally disputed.

15 November 2006

• 09:1809:18, 15 November 2006 diff hist +21 Jews for Jesus i, and other editors, totally dispute this article (cf. talk page, mediation, etc.).

6 November 2006

• 06:3006:30, 6 November 2006 diff hist +21 Jews for Jesus read the talk page, read my talk page, read the mediation page; i've been working on this article for a while. i assure you it's totally disputed.
• 06:2006:20, 6 November 2006 diff hist +21 Jews for Jesus read the talk page . . . this article is 'totally disputed' by many people. mediation is ongoing to address the problem. it has been agreed that the tag will be included.
• 06:1206:12, 6 November 2006 diff hist +21 Jews for Jesus i totally dispute the article. mediation is ongoing. we have the right to include the template. removing it is de facto vandalism.

5 November 2006

• 22:4022:40, 5 November 2006 diff hist +21 Jews for Jesus no, it really is. we're undergoing mediation for that very reason. do not vandalize the article. i have the right to include the tag.
• 22:1522:15, 5 November 2006 diff hist +21 Jews for Jesus this article is totally disputed.~~~~

16 October 2006

• 04:3404:34, 16 October 2006 diff hist +21 Jews for Jesus no, they haven't. i've listed over 10 that remain heavily disputed.

15 October 2006

• 18:3518:35, 15 October 2006 diff hist +22 Jews for Jesus No edit summary
• 09:0209:02, 15 October 2006 diff hist +22 Jews for Jesus now we have vandalism by "Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg" and a refusal to engage in constructive debate.
• 08:2408:24, 15 October 2006 diff hist +22 Jews for Jesus again, we have capitulation to irrationality by "Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg". if you wish to respond to my criticisms in a rigorous manner: do so.

27 September 2006

• 22:2722:27, 27 September 2006 diff hist +53 Jews for Jesus we have consensus; do not rv to pov versions.
• 22:1222:12, 27 September 2006 diff hist +53 Jews for Jesus let's try this. . . .
• 21:4621:46, 27 September 2006 diff hist +90 Jews for Jesus don't vandalize consensus. also, your edit was full of typos.
• 20:4920:49, 27 September 2006 diff hist +54 Jews for Jesus homestar's version is empirically accurate, unlike others.
• 20:1720:17, 27 September 2006 diff hist +54 Jews for Jesus let's try this. . . .
• 20:0920:09, 27 September 2006 diff hist −17 Jews for Jesus removed christianity template. if thomas aquinas doesn't get it, jfj don't.
• 20:0720:07, 27 September 2006 diff hist −14 Jews for Jesus begging the question, first line.
• 20:0620:06, 27 September 2006 diff hist +15 Jews for Jesus added unbalanced tag. this article is ridiculous.
• 20:0220:02, 27 September 2006 diff hist −2 Annus mirabilis papers "humankind's" is ridiculous.

9 September 2006

• 22:3122:31, 9 September 2006 diff hist −1 Jews for Jesus added ref; deleted template.
• 17:5817:58, 9 September 2006 diff hist −9 Jews for Jesus Mantanmoreland, do not revert consensus, NPOV text.
• 08:3108:31, 9 September 2006 diff hist −9 Jews for Jesus looks good, slimvirgin: compromise: added "nearly" ("all" is not factually accurate), and removed the christianity template (if thomas aquinas doesn't get it, JfJ certainly don't).
• 07:5707:57, 9 September 2006 diff hist −11,894 Jews for Jesus rv to NPOV

6 September 2006

• 01:4501:45, 6 September 2006 diff hist +161 Jews for Jesus removing 'disputed' tags is de facto vandalism. this has been discussed on the talk page. do not do it.
• 01:3901:39, 6 September 2006 diff hist +161 Jews for Jesus it has been discussed ad nauseum. it still does not give you the right to vandalize. i've added a disclaimer and disputed templates.
• 01:3401:34, 6 September 2006 diff hist −709 Jews for Jesus slim: please do not vandalize this page
• 01:3101:31, 6 September 2006 diff hist −709 Jews for Jesus humus: do not vandalize this page.
• 01:2301:23, 6 September 2006 diff hist −709 Jews for Jesus rv to page prior to de facto vandalism

5 September 2006

• 22:5622:56, 5 September 2006 diff hist +1 Jews for Jesus typo
• 22:5622:56, 5 September 2006 diff hist −723 Jews for Jesus NPOV intro statement, double-template until consensus

3 September 2006

• 20:3120:31, 3 September 2006 diff hist +206 Jews for Jesus do not rv, please.
• 20:2920:29, 3 September 2006 diff hist −2,119 Jews for Jesus No edit summary
• 20:2120:21, 3 September 2006 diff hist −8,526 Jews for Jesus why? no one listened the first time. i want all POV junk removed.
• 20:1220:12, 3 September 2006 diff hist −8,526 Jews for Jesus rv to NPOV version
• 19:5319:53, 3 September 2006 diff hist +50 Jews for Jesus new tags. this article is a POV mess; the sort of thing that gives Misplaced Pages a bad name.
• 19:4719:47, 3 September 2006 diff hist −195 Jews for Jesus of course it is. the point is there's no consensus about whether or not JfJ is christian; and indeed, semantically it's moot. NPOV is what is looked for here.
• 19:2519:25, 3 September 2006 diff hist −22 Jews for Jesus what's the point?