Misplaced Pages

3 October 2004

• 11:4111:41, 3 October 2004 diff hist +13 Dividend pointed double tax to dividend tax
• 11:3611:36, 3 October 2004 diff hist +730 Dividend tax documenting the maco-economic effects of a tax favoring debt over equity financing
• 10:3410:34, 3 October 2004 diff hist 0 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 →US military would not even dream of proceeding as it does if these thousands of civilians being killed were US citizens?: spelling typo
• 10:3010:30, 3 October 2004 diff hist −98 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 No edit summary
• 10:2510:25, 3 October 2004 diff hist +8,462 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 →US military would not even dream of proceeding as it does if these thousands of civilians being killed were US citizens?

2 October 2004

• 14:2614:26, 2 October 2004 diff hist +56 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 →US military would not even dream of proceeding as it does if these thousands of civilians being killed were US citizens?
• 14:2614:26, 2 October 2004 diff hist +622 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 →US military would not even dream of proceeding as it does if these thousands of civilians being killed were US citizens?
• 14:0914:09, 2 October 2004 diff hist +601 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 →US military would not even dream of proceeding as it does if these thousands of civilians being killed were US citizens?
• 14:0414:04, 2 October 2004 diff hist +4 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 →US military would not even dream of proceeding as it does if these thousands of civilians being killed were US citizens?
• 14:0314:03, 2 October 2004 diff hist +2,620 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 →US military would not even dream of proceeding as it does if these thousands of civilians being killed were US citizens?
• 12:2612:26, 2 October 2004 diff hist +1,787 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 US military would not even dream of proceeding as it does if these thousands of civilians being killed were US citizens?
• 12:0712:07, 2 October 2004 diff hist +56 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 →Before the US attacked Iraq, there was no significant terrorist activity there?
• 12:0612:06, 2 October 2004 diff hist +1,322 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 Before the US attacked Iraq, there was no significant terrorist activity there?
• 11:3811:38, 2 October 2004 diff hist +482 Max Stirner →Influence: more philisophical perspective
• 11:2011:20, 2 October 2004 diff hist −1 Max Stirner The article seems to confuse anarchism and nihilism
• 11:0711:07, 2 October 2004 diff hist −8 Max Stirner →Philosophy: made the language more neutral and corrected typo
• 10:3810:38, 2 October 2004 diff hist +17 Allegiance →References: correct to citation
• 10:3110:31, 2 October 2004 diff hist +373 Talk:Allegiance The original was offensive in its nationalism
• 10:3010:30, 2 October 2004 diff hist −318 Talk:Allegiance No edit summary
• 10:2810:28, 2 October 2004 diff hist +318 N Talk:Allegiance this page was offensive in its nationalism
• 10:1410:14, 2 October 2004 diff hist +22 Allegiance Makes the language more neutral and less nationalistic in its assumptions
• 09:0409:04, 2 October 2004 diff hist +353 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 →control of oil as a reason for invasion
• 03:5503:55, 2 October 2004 diff hist +749 Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 2 →control of oil as a reason for invasion
• 01:3201:32, 2 October 2004 diff hist +3,083 Talk:2004 United States presidential debates →Kerry clearly won the debate

1 October 2004

• 19:5419:54, 1 October 2004 diff hist +341 Talk:Grenada No edit summary
• 19:3919:39, 1 October 2004 diff hist 0 2004 United States presidential debates No edit summary
• 19:2619:26, 1 October 2004 diff hist +1,011 Talk:2004 United States presidential debates →Kerry clearly won the debate
• 17:1117:11, 1 October 2004 diff hist +377 Talk:2004 United States presidential debates →Kerry clearly won the debate
• 17:0717:07, 1 October 2004 diff hist +1,882 Talk:2004 United States presidential debates Kerry clearly won the debate
• 05:4405:44, 1 October 2004 diff hist +1,421 Talk:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki →Historical justification and criticism vs revisionist justification and criticism
• 05:1505:15, 1 October 2004 diff hist +1,852 User talk:VeryVerily just a few people's theories
• 04:4304:43, 1 October 2004 diff hist +1,676 Talk:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki →Historical justification and criticism vs revisionist justification and criticism
• 03:5403:54, 1 October 2004 diff hist +399 Misplaced Pages talk:Two versions reversion/non-reversion wars can be handled more simply
• 03:4703:47, 1 October 2004 diff hist +57 User talk:VeryVerily/Conflicting Misplaced Pages philosophies →Is there a place where the philosophy of wikipedia is discussed?
• 03:4603:46, 1 October 2004 diff hist +958 User talk:VeryVerily/Conflicting Misplaced Pages philosophies Is there a place where the philosophy of wikipedia is discussed?
• 03:2903:29, 1 October 2004 diff hist 0 User:VeryVerily/Conflicting Misplaced Pages philosophies changed statusquoism order to be consistent with extreme to extreme (spectral) ordering which is easier to understand

30 September 2004

• 12:5412:54, 30 September 2004 diff hist +318 Conscription →External links
• 10:4110:41, 30 September 2004 diff hist +2,018 Talk:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki →Terrorism
• 09:5309:53, 30 September 2004 diff hist +71 Talk:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki →Historical justification and criticism vs revisionist justification and criticism
• 09:3309:33, 30 September 2004 diff hist +556 User talk:VeryVerily →weak. All nations conscript as justification for conscription?
• 08:3108:31, 30 September 2004 diff hist +401 User talk:VeryVerily →weak. All nations conscript as justification for conscription?
• 08:2108:21, 30 September 2004 diff hist +57 User talk:VeryVerily →weak. All nations conscript as justification for conscription?
• 08:1908:19, 30 September 2004 diff hist +503 User talk:VeryVerily weak. All nations conscript as justification for conscription?
• 08:0608:06, 30 September 2004 diff hist +766 Talk:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Historical justification and criticism vs revisionist justification and criticism
• 07:5407:54, 30 September 2004 diff hist −2 Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki →Support for use of atomic bombs: corrected formatting
• 07:5207:52, 30 September 2004 diff hist +995 Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki →Support for use of atomic bombs: justification for targeting civilians
• 07:1207:12, 30 September 2004 diff hist +8 Talk:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki →Terrorism
• 07:0607:06, 30 September 2004 diff hist +81 N User:Silverback No edit summary
• 07:0407:04, 30 September 2004 diff hist +114 Talk:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki →becoming non-anonymous