This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:
- 06:10, 29 January 2009 MastCell talk contribs blocked JedRothwell talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Account has long been abandoned, but editor continues to engage in disruptive behavior and advocacy via various IP's)
25 April 2006
- 20:3720:37, 25 April 2006 diff hist +150 Talk:Cold fusion →assertion that authors are never allowed to peer review themselves and related claims
- 20:3320:33, 25 April 2006 diff hist +1,284 Talk:Cold fusion →assertion that authors are never allowed to peer review themselves and related claims
- 20:1920:19, 25 April 2006 diff hist −193 Talk:Wright brothers →Recent edits by []
- 20:1820:18, 25 April 2006 diff hist +194 Talk:Wright brothers →Recent edits by []
- 20:1520:15, 25 April 2006 diff hist −1 Talk:Wright brothers →Recent edits by []
- 20:1420:14, 25 April 2006 diff hist +812 Talk:Wright brothers →Recent edits by []
- 19:5619:56, 25 April 2006 diff hist −7 Talk:Cold fusion →assertion that authors are never allowed to peer review themselves and related claims
- 19:5319:53, 25 April 2006 diff hist +9 Talk:Cold fusion →assertion that authors are never allowed to peer review themselves and related claims
- 19:5319:53, 25 April 2006 diff hist +76 Talk:Cold fusion →assertion that authors are never allowed to peer review themselves and related claims
- 19:5119:51, 25 April 2006 diff hist +1,125 Talk:Cold fusion →assertion that authors are never allowed to peer review themselves and related claims
- 19:2619:26, 25 April 2006 diff hist +70 Cold fusion More clarification; Lewis alone was asked about the critique. (No other reviews were attached to the rejected papers.)
- 19:1619:16, 25 April 2006 diff hist +435 User talk:Jefffire YOU smooshed Shanahan
- 19:0819:08, 25 April 2006 diff hist +1,168 Talk:Cold fusion →assertion that authors are never allowed to peer review themselves and related claims
- 18:3918:39, 25 April 2006 diff hist +4 Cold fusion →Allegations of suppression of cold fusion research
- 18:3718:37, 25 April 2006 diff hist +939 Talk:Cold fusion →assertion that authors are never allowed to peer review themselves and related claims
- 18:2518:25, 25 April 2006 diff hist +992 Talk:Cold fusion →assertion that authors are never allowed to peer review themselves and related claims
- 18:1318:13, 25 April 2006 diff hist −7 Cold fusion rvv "zero degrees kelvin" Very funny.
- 18:0618:06, 25 April 2006 diff hist +1 User talk:Jefffire →Please contact Shanahan
- 18:0518:05, 25 April 2006 diff hist +1,599 User talk:Jefffire Please contact Shanahan
- 17:0617:06, 25 April 2006 diff hist +4 Cold fusion And please do not ask me to justify the assertion that authors are never allowed to peer review themselves!
- 17:0417:04, 25 April 2006 diff hist +114 Cold fusion Explained in somewhat more detail.
- 16:1016:10, 25 April 2006 diff hist +59 Cold fusion Lindley abuse of peer-review incident.
- 16:0816:08, 25 April 2006 diff hist +592 Cold fusion →Allegations of suppression of cold fusion research
- 15:5715:57, 25 April 2006 diff hist +62 Talk:Cold fusion →Please use units of power and energy correctly
- 15:5615:56, 25 April 2006 diff hist +417 Talk:Cold fusion →Please use units of power and energy correctly
- 14:0714:07, 25 April 2006 diff hist −15 Talk:Cold fusion →Please use units of power and energy correctly
- 14:0614:06, 25 April 2006 diff hist +543 Talk:Cold fusion →Please use units of power and energy correctly
- 14:0114:01, 25 April 2006 diff hist +108 Cold fusion Cells often burst from rapid recombination. The explosions are caused by anomalous energy, thousands of times beyond chemistry.
- 13:5813:58, 25 April 2006 diff hist −37 Cold fusion Of course "studies show" this. What else would? This is redundant.
- 13:5513:55, 25 April 2006 diff hist +1,792 Talk:Cold fusion Please use units of power and energy correctly
- 13:4313:43, 25 April 2006 diff hist +276 Cold fusion The units and claims here were in complete chaos. Please see discussion.
24 April 2006
- 00:3400:34, 24 April 2006 diff hist −6 Talk:Cold fusion →Is there a controversy around cold fusion ?
- 00:3200:32, 24 April 2006 diff hist +372 Talk:Cold fusion →Is there a controversy around cold fusion ?
- 00:2500:25, 24 April 2006 diff hist +2,198 Talk:Cold fusion →Please stop adding imaginary nonsense to this article.
23 April 2006
- 22:0022:00, 23 April 2006 diff hist +174 Talk:Cold fusion →Please stop adding imaginary nonsense to this article.
- 21:5821:58, 23 April 2006 diff hist +1,015 Talk:Cold fusion →Please stop adding imaginary nonsense to this article.
- 18:3818:38, 23 April 2006 diff hist +1 m Talk:Cold fusion →to summarize the recent conversation
- 18:3718:37, 23 April 2006 diff hist +721 Talk:Cold fusion →to summarize the recent conversation
- 04:4304:43, 23 April 2006 diff hist +3 m Talk:Cold fusion →Restructure to avoid repetitions
- 04:3604:36, 23 April 2006 diff hist −2 m Cold fusion No edit summary
- 03:2903:29, 23 April 2006 diff hist +5 Talk:Cold fusion →Please stop adding imaginary nonsense to this article.
- 03:2803:28, 23 April 2006 diff hist +549 Talk:Cold fusion →Please stop adding imaginary nonsense to this article.
- 03:2203:22, 23 April 2006 diff hist +1,461 Talk:Cold fusion Please stop adding imaginary nonsense to this article.
- 03:0403:04, 23 April 2006 diff hist +897 Cold fusion Skeptical imaginary nonsense deleted. Let's have confirmed facts only, please. Do not make it up as you go along.
- 02:4202:42, 23 April 2006 diff hist +27 Talk:Cold fusion →to summarize the recent conversation
- 02:3702:37, 23 April 2006 diff hist +1,107 Talk:Cold fusion →to summarize the recent conversation
- 02:2302:23, 23 April 2006 diff hist −3 Talk:Cold fusion →to summarize the recent conversation
- 01:5801:58, 23 April 2006 diff hist +2,176 Talk:Cold fusion →to summarize the recent conversation
- 01:4301:43, 23 April 2006 diff hist +390 Talk:Cold fusion →Restructure to avoid repetitions
- 01:1001:10, 23 April 2006 diff hist +110 Talk:Cold fusion →Scientific Acceptance?
 |