4 January 2010
- 14:0114:01, 4 January 2010 diff hist +439 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Tree ring data is rubbish but so what?: further on McIntyre
- 13:4113:41, 4 January 2010 diff hist +522 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Tree ring data is rubbish but so what?: talk on deletion of half a paragraph which has consensus
- 13:3813:38, 4 January 2010 diff hist +404 Climatic Research Unit email controversy Undid revision 335805345 by William M. Connolley (talk) reach consensus at talk page
- 13:3313:33, 4 January 2010 diff hist +752 User talk:Prodego →On the removal of sourced statement without consensus - seeking input: resp. to ChrisO
- 13:0413:04, 4 January 2010 diff hist 0 m Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Swifthack?: hack, gate, it's all words ..
- 13:0313:03, 4 January 2010 diff hist +250 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Swifthack?: undue, again
- 13:0013:00, 4 January 2010 diff hist +898 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Tree ring data is rubbish but so what?: paragraph changes for the worse
- 12:0812:08, 4 January 2010 diff hist +357 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Swifthack?: undue weight
- 11:2511:25, 4 January 2010 diff hist +810 User talk:Troed →Climategatekeeper: don't do heated arguments etc
- 11:0211:02, 4 January 2010 diff hist +982 User talk:Troed →Climategatekeeper: talking sometimes better than editing
- 10:5310:53, 4 January 2010 diff hist +378 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Proposal for FAQ entry: much better phrasing proposed
- 10:4610:46, 4 January 2010 diff hist +409 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Who can speak for who?: adding sources
- 10:3710:37, 4 January 2010 diff hist +338 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Blog-sourced material removed: a better source was already proposed for inclusion
- 10:3510:35, 4 January 2010 diff hist +1,532 User talk:Prodego asking for help
3 January 2010
- 16:0716:07, 3 January 2010 diff hist +637 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Another go: we're saying the same thing - quote them all
- 14:5014:50, 3 January 2010 diff hist +1,048 User talk:JzG →Regarding SPA: questions
- 13:0013:00, 3 January 2010 diff hist +610 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Climategate: support for controversy-section
- 11:3211:32, 3 January 2010 diff hist +388 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Jones email 19th take two: adding clarification
- 11:2211:22, 3 January 2010 diff hist +426 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Jones email 19th take two: correcting a misunderstanding, I think
- 11:1711:17, 3 January 2010 diff hist +548 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Who can speak for who?: alleged from source is not the same
2 January 2010
- 22:5522:55, 2 January 2010 diff hist +59 Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case →Statement by uninvolved Troed: linking to talk page, not wanting to add clutter here
- 22:5222:52, 2 January 2010 diff hist +1,495 User talk:JzG comments on SPA claims
- 20:4920:49, 2 January 2010 diff hist +508 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Jones email 19th take two: wrong focus
- 19:3419:34, 2 January 2010 diff hist +496 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Jones email 19th take two: sourcing the paraphrase in detail
- 17:2117:21, 2 January 2010 diff hist +528 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Jones email 19th take two: misrepresentation of reasons
- 16:4416:44, 2 January 2010 diff hist +645 Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case →Statement by uninvolved Troed: SPA - sigh
- 16:3316:33, 2 January 2010 diff hist +553 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Jones email 19th take two: sourcing issue only intention
- 16:2116:21, 2 January 2010 diff hist +715 Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case →Climate Change Probation: statement by uninvolved Troed
- 14:5914:59, 2 January 2010 diff hist +2 m Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Fully sourced suggested change to article introduction: reported -> reportedly
- 14:5714:57, 2 January 2010 diff hist +195 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Fully sourced suggested change to article introduction: support with caveat
- 14:1014:10, 2 January 2010 diff hist +348 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Jones email 19th take two: asking for clarification with regards to proper sourcing
- 12:5712:57, 2 January 2010 diff hist +553 Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Climate Change →Objection: objection added, with reason
- 12:4012:40, 2 January 2010 diff hist +296 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Another go: misunderstanding the topic
- 12:3712:37, 2 January 2010 diff hist +395 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Jones email 19th take two: back on topic
- 11:5511:55, 2 January 2010 diff hist +358 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Jones email 19th take two: notability
- 11:5111:51, 2 January 2010 diff hist +328 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Another go: it's not up to us to only report some sources
- 11:2711:27, 2 January 2010 diff hist +664 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Proposal for FAQ entry: clarifying the need
- 11:1011:10, 2 January 2010 diff hist +1,508 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy suggestion for better sourcing in the article on Jones email of the 16th
- 10:1810:18, 2 January 2010 diff hist +866 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Another go: why only report half the truth
1 January 2010
- 20:2120:21, 1 January 2010 diff hist +327 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Suggested Title, Hopefully Neutral Enough
- 18:4918:49, 1 January 2010 diff hist +122 User talk:Cs32en →Few or none
- 17:2317:23, 1 January 2010 diff hist +621 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Proposal for FAQ entry
- 17:0317:03, 1 January 2010 diff hist −335 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy Reverted incorrect SPA regarding my account, see Cs32en talk page
- 16:5516:55, 1 January 2010 diff hist +274 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Proposal for FAQ entry
- 16:5216:52, 1 January 2010 diff hist +153 User talk:Cs32en →Few or none
- 16:4616:46, 1 January 2010 diff hist +155 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Suggested Title, Hopefully Neutral Enough
- 16:4216:42, 1 January 2010 diff hist +280 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Proposal for FAQ entry
- 16:3816:38, 1 January 2010 diff hist +519 User talk:Cs32en →Few or none: new section
- 16:3416:34, 1 January 2010 diff hist +320 Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy →Straw poll: How much support does the existing title have?
- 16:2816:28, 1 January 2010 diff hist +919 Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Climate Change →Discussion
 |