This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2402:8100:224e:41ae:9cac:ec16:b40e:28a6 (talk) at 10:58, 28 April 2021 (→Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:58, 28 April 2021 by 2402:8100:224e:41ae:9cac:ec16:b40e:28a6 (talk) (→Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Showbiz826
Showbiz826 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Showbiz826/Archive.
This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.
23 April 2021
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Mohammed.Khandwala (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Compare to from prior sock Hmkwdpr. Editor is focused on Uttaran and Mohammed Burhanuddin, two favorite articles of Showbiz and socks. The recent history of Burhanuddin shows a focus from this editor, prior socks and various IP's in ranges that Showbiz has used before repeatedly trying to add poorly sourced excessively detailed material (basically fancruft). Ravensfire (talk) 22:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- @TheSandDoctor:, @Oshwah: - sadly, the IP editor (who IS a sock of Showbiz and showing their usual eloquence) is correct, this really should have been Hmkwfrance. I was cleaning up after the last named SB sock and copy-pasta got me. Ravensfire (talk) 14:07, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
These seems a absent minded report. Can't you look at disimilarity between the two, The person who reported this said 2 articles as Showbiz fav. but see the history neither Showbiz nor his socks ever edited in those articles ever.
Merge this into Hmkwdpr and its sock which is entirely different from this sock farm.2402:8100:2244:EE52:A8D8:8EF7:AFB7:E9B9 (talk) 08:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
This appeal is likely to Hmkwfrance sock farm. The user who reported this must be an Jackass.2402:8100:2244:EE52:A8D8:8EF7:AFB7:E9B9 (talk) 08:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - requesting confirmation and sleeper check TheSandDoctor 16:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Possible. Same geolocation as Hmkwdpr, but different ranges and user agents. ~Oshwah~ 22:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- @TheSandDoctor: Please merge this into this SPI of this user, this was a ill-minded report by a jackass editor, who himself accepted this. Please do it soon.2402:8100:224E:41AE:9CAC:EC16:B40E:28A6 (talk) 10:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)