This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Justas Jonas (talk | contribs) at 19:50, 20 January 2007 (Kindly observe WP:Harassment and WP:NPA. Thank you very much.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:50, 20 January 2007 by Justas Jonas (talk | contribs) (Kindly observe WP:Harassment and WP:NPA. Thank you very much.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:Badbilltucker/Archive/Dec. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Welcome to the Kindness Campaign!
|
Just my way of saying thanks to newcomers to the Kindness Campaign... a delicious home-baked chocolate chip cookie! Yum. :D ♥ Kylu (talk • contribs • email • logs • count) |
Living persons
OK. I will remember that. I just remember reading in wikipedia somewhere that, so to prevent possiblity of lawsuits in this area, to list a person as living if the article does not have a reputable source indicating otherwise.
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Pak-Afghan Relations
Thanks Badbilltucker for adding Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Pak-Afghan Relations to WikiProject Council,
It needs expansion. and it is part of WikiProject Politics.
DYK
|
On 24 September, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George J. Adler, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
RfB With A Smile :)
|
Fuck you
-User:The Bohemian Shinobis yeah, that's right, bitch! You are all pieces of shit!
Blood?
Alucard44 Here. What did you mean by that last Message?
I just Like Castlevania
Mission Accomplished!
Alucard44 (talk · contribs) Here. Open the Soft Drink Project page in edit to see where to fix stuff.
Resources
What exactly are you supposed to add when you are giving a resource?? Name of book, author, publisher....what?? I am trying to work on the Billy (dog) article and I do have a book here with referance to them which I would like to add as a resource, and while your so wonderful as to help me, how do you get one of those contents boxes?? Thanks Blufawn
Smile
Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
The Animals of Farthing Wood Project Proposal
Thank you very much for helping me out with that - it is my first Project, and I really appreciate the advice you gave me. MelicansMatkin
Thank You
Thank you for your support on updating Watertown, SD page. This is for a class project and really appreciate your help. TRM18TRM18
Diocesan Infobox
To the creators of Diocesan/Archdiocesan articles
I have proposed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism an infobox for Catholic Dioceses. I have not gotten any feedback on this proposal, so I’m culling feedback, advice, corrections, etc. for this. If you have the time, would you check out User:SkierRMH/Diocese_Infobox and give me some feedback! Thanks much!!
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
 Issue II - January 1, 2007 | |
| |
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please drop me a line. | |
Assessments
I am very sorry. I didn't mean to defame or criticise anyone. Kkrystian 19:14 (UTC+1) 3 Januray 2007
Hi Tucker
I removed your talk page from my watchlist and regret it now. I did a massive copy-edit of Neetham and wanted to see what you thought before I went forward. I still don't get from the language if this is religion or history, or both. I may have perhaps made things a bit too current.
I want to let you in on some thoughts I'm having. I basically need your advice. I want to start two new Wikiprojects. Wikiproject Mental Health and Wikiproject alternative sexuality. I've got no clue how to start either one, but I have a vision for both. Yours truly, Nina Odell 17:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Ayyavazhi removal
Sir, why you removed Ayyavazhi from here? The sentence (you mentioned) is changed and added appropriate citations. If you find any thing (mistakes) like this please ask I will add appropriate citations using the sources with me. But please add the article there in the Good article cadidates page. Thanks - Paul 18:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry very much sir. I think you yourself felt uncomfortable to place the article there for some unknown reason. Also I was not knowledgable of such things you notted untill. Sorry and Thanks.
- Also one request too. While discussing with me please use simple english that I can understand quicky since I am a non-native speaker to English and not so much knowledgable with the language usages. Thanks and also Sorry for all my mis-understandings. Thank you very much also for your help edits. - Paul 19:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- No matter sir. Also, You proceed on your own way making it to FA status. Since you are much more experinced than me, you know what to do. And ask me for any citations and for any doubts about the texts in the article. Thanks once again. - Paul 19:48, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
State Auditors of Missouri
As noted in my comments on the article's Talk page, the wiki-table in the State Auditors of Missouri article you created needs to be updated to to reflect the swearing-in of State Auditor-elect Susan Montee. --TommyBoy 21:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Left Hand Path
Image wise, the Inverted Pentagram. Its a nonspecific and commonly used in the LHP.
Is there a difference between "work group" and "task force?" They both sound good to me really. Task force kind of suggests a specific set of goals. I guess task force. WerewolfSatanist 05:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
So not to be a pain, but how long before we have our own page to call our own and properly bring the Devil to Wiki?WerewolfSatanist 23:24, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
The Big Man requests a better explanation of the distinction between "task force" and "work group." Sorry to bother you still. Its just weird to actually affect change like this WerewolfSatanist 23:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Work Group. Work group implies more of a working together kind of feeling (and also a little more permenance). Thanks again. If I wasn't lazy I'd do it myself. WerewolfSatanist 00:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Rare breed article discussions
Thanks for thinking of me but I think with my previous history being deleted for the same sort of thing I will sit this one out. I have heard of British Bulldogge and Olde English Bulldogge but don't know enough about them to comment, I'm more of a hound person myself. Blufawn
B9 hummingbird hovering
Hello I would like some assistance in charting a commonality between transignification, transubstantiation and ganachakra and appropriate deixes and editing. May I have some assistance with an article that I would very much like to initiate on "saccidananda or "sat-cit-ananda". I have asked Ekajati for some assistance as well as the German Wiki crew to assist with a translation of their comparable page (http://de.wikipedia.org/Diskussion:Sat-Chit-Ananda) so we English Wikikin are not recreating the wheel! I would also appreciate peer review and collaboration of trance.
Wheels within wheels for the glory of the Ophanim Thanking you in anticipation Namaste in agape and walking my talk in beauty B9_hummingbird_hovering 17:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Portal:Egypt
Hi, tucker. I would like to ask you to design a portal for Egypt. We now has 1 FA, 1 A Class and 3 GA articles within the scope of WikiProject Egypt and as you know I don't have enough experience to design it myself. Thank you.
--Meno25 17:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Changes in Ayyavazhi
Sir, I re-edited the section Inclusiveness and exclusivity in Ayyavazhi article, since I started a new article on that section as Inclusiveness and exclusivity in Ayyavazhi. Do this re-formation now, affects your works on that article any way? If so you change back the section to the previous level.
Also Iam on a trip to Chennai and so I may not repond quick to the articles and the discussions for two or three days. Thanks - Paul 19:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Blue Network
Pursuant to your suggestion, I have added a bibliography to Blue Network, and would like your further thoughts regarding same. Eric O. Costello 19:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
As this seems to be your area...
Category:Unassessed LGBT articles could do with some assessing. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 20:12, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Cocktails
Hello. As a person interested in WikiProject Cocktails, you may be interested to know that a name change is being considered from Cocktails to Mixed Drinks. Please add your opinions to the discussion and vote. Also, check out the recent changes to the WikiProject area. Consider becoming an active Participant. Thanks! --Willscrlt 08:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hello again. As someone who seems pretty familiar with WikiProject proceedings and Misplaced Pages in general, I was wondering what your view is on ending the renaming discussion of this project early. I was the silly person who set such a long term for voting (expecting a bit bigger response and a lot more conflict). However, looking at the edit histories of all the past and present members of the Project, I think all but two members have voted who are likely to vote (the other two seem to have gone on hiatus, but at least one supported the change; the other I'm uncertain, but doubt he would object). That would indicate 100% acceptance of the proposal. As I start working in earnest on the assessment of articles, it seems ridiculous to continue creating new categories, templates, etc. under the old name only to have to change them in less than half a month. As a result, some have been named using the new name (depending on how optimistic I feel and how difficult it would be to rename the thing later), and some still have the old. Would there likely be any negative fallout from ending the discussion and voting early, even though we have not yet met the early ending criteria I arbitrarily set? We obviously have consensus among those most likely to care or even express any opinion. And waiting makes much more work down the line. I'd appreciate your feedback, here or on my talk page, whichever is more convenient for you. Thanks. --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 03:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding and the advice. I will do it then whenever I feel ready to tackle the challenge. :-) Probably within the next 48 hours. --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 14:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
A lone voice in the wilderness...
Thanks for your note; I've seen your posts and appreciated them. I continue to be amazed at some people's reasoning skills, if they can even be called that ... Ugh! Anyway, thanks for your efforts. :-) Keesiewonder 00:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
English mediaeval monasteries
I've noticed that you've been adding ratings to the articles on certain English mediaeval monastic sites and related topics as part of the wiki Catholicism project. Many of your ratings seem to me rather arbitrary and to be honest I would strongly question whether your giving such ratings is useful at all; it would be more constructive to point out where an article is, in your opinion, weak (as you did with the Beaulieu Abbey article). The speed at which you are giving these ratings also gives great cause for concern. Soph 01:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Article assessments
Hi Badbilltucker.
I'm a member of WikiProject Abortion, and I've been working on article assessments. I've never assessed articles before, and I'm not sure I'm doing it right. I wonder if you could take a look at a few of the articles I've assessed and tell me if you think I'm way off base. Here are a handful of my attempts: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 I would greatly appreciate any pointers you can share. Thanks in advance. -GTBacchus 08:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Please stop what I am perceiving as unjustified attacks
Whether you intend them or not, I am very troubled by an ongoing focus on me, rather than the issue, on the Hinduism Wikiproject page. If you're concerned about my conduct, let's discuss it in a productive way - but making comments like 'notice the ongoing behavior', etc. are decidely unproductive and I believe entirely unwarranted. Thank you for your consideration. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 18:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Armenia
Hello - I wanted to point out that Armenians are not Eastern Orthodox, they are Oriental Orthodox. Please remove the tags you added to the talk pages of Armenian Monasteries as they do not belong there. Thanks, --RaffiKojian 19:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- No worries. There is no listing that is appropriate on that page. There should be a separate listing of either the Armenian Church or the umbrella Oriental churches which have an article. In any case, these monasteries all fall neatly in the realm of wikiproject Armenia - so they can always get that tag if need be. --RaffiKojian 05:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Failure to answer questions?
Hi Badbilltucker. Perhaps I am missing something. It seems to me that Ryan has given direct answers to your questions. Could you, for my benefit, state (in question form) exactly the question that you believe Ryan did not answer? Thanks. --BostonMA 19:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
WP:LDS Assessment and subpages
Thanks for your note. I've responded on my talk page. -User:Visorstuff
Lutheranism
Hi! Can you help remove the 'unknown importance' tag from the Lutheranism article? I guess I could probably do it too ... but will give you the option first ... Thanks! Keesiewonder 11:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
WP
I am just curious, but why are pushing so much for the creation of so many WikiProjects? They should be created by people who are knowledgeable about the subject and will be able to devote time to them - otherwise they will simply be lame ducks with a a bunch of tags around; which will be worse than not having the WP in the first place since its desolate state will discourage new users from joining in - something that won't happen with quality and functioning WPs. WikiProjects are not a trophy collection u know :)) Baristarim 14:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, no problems :) I agree that every article should be covered somehow.. Baristarim 14:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
General about WP:COUNCIL and WP:TIS
If i were to join the council, what would i be expected to do? Or would it just be where i could show that i assisted in Transport in Scotland. Remember i originally had a sdifferent proposals but due misunderstangs due to me this expanded into the present project. I still haven't got round to sorting the page out yet. When i have more free time, i will follow the guide and see what happens.
I have also tried on the talk page to WP:SCOTLAND, at least a while back, and got no response. What do you think i should do? Should i try again? Simply south 17:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think i mentioned that i needed help with the project and should it be a part of WP:SCOTLAND, either that or related. See Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Scotland#Wikiproject.
- I'll join the council to show that i assisted with WP:TIS. I've also raised a question on criteria towards lists, templates and categories, amongst others on the council talk page. Simply south 17:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. I've got some urgent univesity work to do and so that is why i am trying to take this break. Also, do you have any ideas how lists, templates and categories could be rated? Simply south 18:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry for the above link. Anyway i'll get back to you, i just need to expand out from railways right now first. Maybe i should have sub-cats for different modes of transport. I think i will wait a while longer before assessment on the project and when i can focus on it. Thanks. Simply south 18:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Expert attention on Religion
Hey, thanks for your edit to Category:Pages needing expert attention from Religion experts. Turns out the template {{Expert-subject-cat}} already takes care of adding the category to it. No need to do it manually. :) --Brad Beattie (talk) 00:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Mariko Yashida and Shintoism
Hi, you've recently added the Wikiproject Shinto banner to Talk:Mariko Yashida. I'm not sure if it was an automated edit, but this article is about a comic book character. The article makes no mention of anything having to do with Shintoism, and from my personal memory of the comics she was in, I don't believe she had anything to do with Shintoism. Brad T. Cordeiro 22:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
DYK
See . Thanks for telling us that. Also, please post at Misplaced Pages talk:Did you know, not Template talk:Did you know. Some people mix them up, but WPT:DYK is the discussion page, adn T:DYKT is the suggestions page. Thanks. Nishkid64 00:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
EG
I too loved the Foundation trilogy and was excited enough when I first discovered Misplaced Pages to compare it to the Encyclopedia Galactica (although my enthusiasm has fallen off a bit as I realized Misplaced Pages's limitations). I was just so pleased to discover I had this "ultimate archive" dream (and related to Misplaced Pages) in common with someone else that I felt obligated to share! Um, now you know. —vivacissamamente 11:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
WP:ADOPT
Hi there,
Looking through our Archives I saw that you took an interest in the Adopt-a-user program during its formation and development. Well this is just a quick message to tell you the program is well and truly lifted off, with over 200 users involved in the program, 50+ active Adopters and approx. 150 Adoptees, and always expanding. If your still interested please pop by WP:ADOPT, have a look around and ask any questions you want on our talk page. Look forward to seeing you there. Cheers Lethaniol 15:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
One Correction
Sir, one correction; It was noted that, Ayyavazhi was founded by Ayya Vaikundar in 19th century South India. ==> Ayyavazhi was not founded by Vaikundar. Ayyavazhi rise-up as a religion(developed) after the period of Vaikundar only based on his teachings, but not initially founded by him. If you have anny suggestion please tell. Thanks - Paul 19:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Help?
I am really messing up Template:WikiProject Iran, can you help fix it like you did for our Burmese one? Thank you so much! Chris 04:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Happy King Day
"The greatness of a community is most accurately measured by the compassionate actions of its members, ... a heart of grace and a soul generated by love." - Coretta Scott King (attributed)
Award
Tamaskan
I just want to make sure before I put my article up again that you think I have enough referances. We have The Tamaskan Dog Register website, Tamaskan Dog Society of Great Britain website, National Tamaskan Club of America website, The Tamaskan Dog Showing Club at judgedogs.com we have 4 breeders websites in 3 different countries. We also have 2 local newspaper articles, a Tamaskan Brochure (although it is published by the register and has no IBAN no. as it is a brochure not book) as well as the old Tamaskan Breeders guide, a mention in Our Dogs and a profile on dogbreedinfo.com do you think that would be enough or should I leave it a bit longer until we have a bit more positive publicity? Blufawn
Yes atheism is immune
ttp://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Historical_persecution_by_atheism#.5B.5BHistorical_persecution_by_atheism.5D.5D I would like to word it right but can not because there is no way to not be offensive I can't think of how. Please help. Vote to keep the article. There are articles on Chrisitian, Judaism and Islam but why not atheism? Fair is Fair. LoveMonkey 06:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Temples and shrines in Kyoto
Hiya. Regarding your decision to split the Category:Temples and shrines of Kyoto - I'm not particularly opposed to the move, I would just like to mention a few points. (1) I originally created the category with the phrasing "temples and shrines" with the intention that "Buddhist temples and Shinto shrines" was implied. Now that they are split, why not go for "Buddhist temples in Kyoto" or "Temples in Kyoto" and "Shinto shrines in Kyoto" or "Shrines in Kyoto"? That is to say, since all temples (寺) are Buddhist and all shrines (神社) are Shinto, why not shrink down the category names? (2) There is a degree of syncretism in Japanese religion, and while it is fairly simple to label all -dera, -ji, and -in places as Buddhist and all -jinja and -jingu places as Shinto, is this split really 100% accurate? Do these places not contain elements of both faith systems? As I said, I don't really have a problem with this move, I just want to make sure that we've considered all the angles and done what's ultimately best organizationally. Thoughts? LordAmeth 20:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Additions
Sir, I've made some additions to the Teachings section in Ayyavazhi article. Please take a look.
Also, One thing I wish to remain once again, (perhaps you might not have noticed, which I told earlier)
- "one correction; It was noted in the article that, Ayyavazhi was founded by Ayya Vaikundar in 19th century South India. ==> Ayyavazhi was not founded by Vaikundar. Ayyavazhi rise-up as a religion(developed) after the period of Vaikundar only based on his teachings, but not initially founded by him."
Sir if any suggestion please tell. Also, Thanks for all help edits. - Paul 00:40, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Okey, Sir. Sorry and Thanks very much for all helps and quick response. - Paul 00:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
New WP:PARA page
Hey. I'd like to delete this page you created recently; the very fact that we have those categories (and a link to them in our navbox) makes this redundant. --InShaneee 01:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Crap alive! I didn't know that was even possible! Consider my objections withdrawn with all haste; that's just awesome (however, I'm still not sure that the 'adding articles to that page' goal needs to be there; that's a pretty mechanical task that can be done using the handy-dandy assessment log). --InShaneee 01:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Don't suppose I could convince you to volenteer for the job? :) --InShaneee 02:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Rightous! One other thing though: the page seems a bit sparse. According to the Assessment page, the project includes exactly 600 articles at present. Do you think it's just because a lot are missing tags? --InShaneee 02:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Alright, cool. Just be careful; Quang khem sounds like an actual animal (and thus not under our scope), and creatures that are purely mythological in nature fall under the Mythology project's scope. --InShaneee 02:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and you can find a list of all current Paranormal articles that may be missing Cats here. --InShaneee 02:11, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- That's dangerous territory, though, do be careful. Many 'mythological' creatures don't qualify as Cryptids (as no one seems to be claiming that they were or ever real, and many would argue that once a creature is confirmed as 'real', it no longer qualifies as a Cryptid (and thus wouldn't be under our scope, anyway). --InShaneee 02:16, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and you can find a list of all current Paranormal articles that may be missing Cats here. --InShaneee 02:11, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Alright, cool. Just be careful; Quang khem sounds like an actual animal (and thus not under our scope), and creatures that are purely mythological in nature fall under the Mythology project's scope. --InShaneee 02:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Rightous! One other thing though: the page seems a bit sparse. According to the Assessment page, the project includes exactly 600 articles at present. Do you think it's just because a lot are missing tags? --InShaneee 02:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Don't suppose I could convince you to volenteer for the job? :) --InShaneee 02:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Caesar Rodriguez
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Caesar Rodriguez, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Sorry about prod-ing this but a single unverified line seems lame after a year sooo.... Pigman 18:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the updated info. I've removed the prod because I think it's now a nice stub worth keeping. Cheers. --Pigman 19:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Category confusion
What's a way to fix some category mess like what I see at this link? "first century Christianity" is red-linked to a category that itself is also red-linked (Ancient Christian Demonimations). The latter contains one article ... I'm so confused! Thanks for your thoughts; hope you're well. Keesiewonder 03:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
No rush; you fixed what I was confused about. Thanks again, and I'm glad you're feeling better. Keesiewonder 00:00, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Wiki Project Central America
Badbiltucker - Can you please move the page for the proposed project to an actua =l project, or do we need to wait for something? I'm ready to go!!! Srice13 06:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
List of religions and religious denominations
Since we already have List of religions it isn't clear to me what the point of this is. I would suggest making it a redirect. JoshuaZ 04:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Prince Joseph Wenzel of Liechtenstein
Prince Joseph Wenzel of Liechtenstein under Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Switzerland? I'm guessing there must not be a WikiProject Liechtenstein so we toss the L'steins in with the Swiss? House of Scandal 18:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- There is not now and never is likely to be a project directly relating to Liechtenstein. Also, unfortunately, the quality of the majority of the Liechtenstein articles is not really at all good. By having them assessed and included in the scope of a project, they might receive a bit more attention, particularly if individuals interested in Liechtenstein joined the project. The France project has just recently expanded to include Andorra and Monaco on a similar basis. Eventually, when I get the articles lists together for all these projects, they can also be checked for improvements, vandalism, and other changes. I wish the country were large enough to get its own project, but I really can't see that ever happening, and having an interested project is better than not having one. I hope anyway. Badbilltucker 18:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Cool. No objections. BTW, I've noticed you've made several minor edits to articles I made in the past week. Thanks for the attention, my work often needs tweaking. House of Scandal 18:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Portal:Electronics
Hey, I would appreciate your input if you could give it a quick once over. Joe I 19:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Vaguely wondering.
Out of interest, how many pages got the Misplaced Pages Appreciation Day message? I'm finding it everywhere... Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 01:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Scottish Fauna
Dear Badbilltucker, I have just posted a new article: Fauna of Scotland. I'd like to think it is a decent amateur effort, but I am not a zoologist and would appreciate input from Wikipedians with zoological credentials. I note the existence of the WikiProject Mammals, but I didn't want to go blundering in. Any advice or suggestions gratefully received. --Ben MacDui (Talk) 11:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Wales project proposal
Thanks for the messages you sent me. I'm having problems connecting to the internet at home right now, but I'm managing to connect ad hoc. I would love some help in creating a project page, as I wouldn't have the first clue where to start. Please keep in touch, although I apologise in advance if I cannot answer you as soon as I would usually have done. Cheers!--Pilipala9 14:59, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
OMG!
I left you a thank you note at .
FYI, he did get a welcome message, from me, that he called spam.
As I'm sure you've now noticed, he removed your post on his talk, another editor reverted this, and JJ's removed it again. Because of this flurry, you may be interested in reading the AN/I and checkuser I initiated last week for the very kinds of things that you've noticed today. Kind Regards, Keesiewonder 19:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Kindly Observe WP:Harassment and WP:NPA
Please stop cluttering my user talk page. Thank you. Justas Jonas 19:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)