This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ArbClerkBot (talk | contribs) at 23:58, 16 June 2021 (→COVID-19 discretionary sanctions authorised: Adding links to talk page sections (bot)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:58, 16 June 2021 by ArbClerkBot (talk | contribs) (→COVID-19 discretionary sanctions authorised: Adding links to talk page sections (bot))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
ArbitrationCommittee
| Misplaced Pages Arbitration |
|---|
 |
| Open proceedings |
| Active sanctions |
| Arbitration Committee |
Audit
|
| Track related changes |
This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.
Announcement archives:- 0 (2008-12 – 2009-01)
- 1 (to 2009-02)
- 2 (to 2009-05)
- 3 (to 2009-06)
- 4 (to 2009-07)
- 5 (to 2009-12)
- 6 (to 2010-12)
- 7 (to 2011-12)
- 8 (to 2012-12)
- 9 (to 2013-12)
- 10 (to 2015-12)
- 11 (to 2018-04)
- 12 (to 2020-08)
- 13 (to 2023-03)
- 14 (to present)
Motion regarding retaining personal identifying information
The Arbitration Committee has passed the following motion:
Information disclosed to the Arbitration Committee should be retained no longer than necessary. In order to further this goal, the committee will, beginning in April of each year, examine the information stored on the Arbitration Committee wiki. In general, information is considered no longer necessary if the user has not edited under any account for a significant number of years or if the reason for the private information to be held has passed. In these cases, the information should be removed from the relevant page, or the page deleted. It is noted that some information is retained for the purposes of stopping sockpuppetry and, where possible, this should be stored at the checkuser wiki and that technical limitations of wiki software would potentially allow information to be accessed again in the future.
For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 48 § Motion regarding retaining personal identifying information
Arbitration motion regarding Antisemitism in Poland
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case ("Article sourcing expectations") is amended to read as follows: The Arbitration Committee advises that administrators may impose "reliable-source consensus required" as a discretionary sanction on all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. On articles where "reliable-source consensus required" is in effect, when a source that is not a high quality source (an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journals, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution) is added and subsequently challenged by reversion, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 18:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 48 § Arbitration motion regarding Antisemitism in Poland
Changes to functionary team
At his request by email to the committee, the CheckUser permissions of DGG are removed. The Arbitration Committee sincerely thanks DGG for his service as a CheckUser. Maxim(talk) 13:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Changes to functionary team
Uhooep unblocked
Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, Uhooep (talk · contribs) is unblocked, subject to a one-account restriction. Maxim(talk) 18:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
COVID-19 discretionary sanctions authorised
The Arbitration Committee has authorised standard discretionary sanctions for the area of COVID-19 which supersede the community-authorised general sanctions for the same topic area by motion following a case request. The motion is as follows:
The case request is accepted under the title COVID-19 and resolved by motion with the following remedy:
- Discretionary sanctions
(i) The community COVID-19 general sanctions are hereby rescinded and are replaced by standard discretionary sanctions, which are authorized for all edits about, and all articles related to, COVID-19, broadly construed.
(ii) All sanctions in force when this remedy is enacted are endorsed and will become standard discretionary sanctions governed by the standard procedure from the moment of enactment.
(iii) Notifications issued under COVID-19 general sanctions become alerts for twelve months from their date of issue, then expire.
(iv) All existing and past sanctions and restrictions placed under COVID-19 general sanctions will be transcribed by the arbitration clerks in the arbitration enforcement log.
(v) Any requests for enforcement that may be open when this remedy is enacted shall proceed, but any remedy that is enacted should be enacted as a discretionary sanction.
(vi) Administrators who have enforced the COVID-19 general sanctions are thanked for their work and asked to continue providing administrative assistance enforcing discretionary sanctions and at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 23:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § COVID-19 discretionary sanctions authorised