Misplaced Pages

Talk:Category (philosophy)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ludvikus (talk | contribs) at 16:52, 27 January 2007 ([]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:52, 27 January 2007 by Ludvikus (talk | contribs) ([])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Usefulness of Misplaced Pages

--Ludvikus 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages should not only be relevant to the world, it should be especially relevant to Misplaced Pages users. As such a user, when I search for "categories" I would find the information hidden away at Misplaced Pages:Category schemes much more useful than a word game. Perhaps this entry can be appended to indicate its context.


Done Mostlyharmless 23:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Category of being

--Ludvikus 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Why isn't this and Category of being the same article? /Popperipopp 12:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
One reason is that the above is merely a single category. --Ludvikus 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Categories

The plural is the correct usage. --Ludvikus 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

On reflection I think you're right. But then this article ought to be at Categories (philosophy) in my opinion, with Categories redirecting to Category, since just "Categories" is ambiguous. Hairy Dude 13:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
With with your support, I've just made the Bold Wiki move. --Ludvikus 16:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)