This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Banno (talk | contribs) at 20:36, 27 January 2007 (Reverted edits by Ludvikus (talk) to last version by Popperipopp). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:36, 27 January 2007 by Banno (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by Ludvikus (talk) to last version by Popperipopp)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Usefulness of Misplaced Pages
--Ludvikus 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages should not only be relevant to the world, it should be especially relevant to Misplaced Pages users. As such a user, when I search for "categories" I would find the information hidden away at Misplaced Pages:Category schemes much more useful than a word game. Perhaps this entry can be appended to indicate its context.
Category of being
--Ludvikus 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Why isn't this and Category of being the same article? /Popperipopp 12:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- One reason is that the above is merely a single category. --Ludvikus 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Categories
The plural is the correct usage. --Ludvikus 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- On reflection I think you're right. But then this article ought to be at Categories (philosophy) in my opinion, with Categories redirecting to Category, since just "Categories" is ambiguous. Hairy Dude 13:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)