This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:43, 6 August 2021 (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 08:43, 6 August 2021 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
User:WorkingHard
- Evidence
This user has been reverting numerous deletions of irrelevent information I and other users have made at Jessica Lunsford. This user is obviously upset that I am deleting his advertising having made the website for this dead girl. After a recent edit this user posted as WorkingHard and pasted a note on my talk page that I was banned from posting.Cumberbund 07:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- It is the IP that needs blocking, not the account. The IP has been blocked. Iolakana| 14:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- It is a shame what is going on with the Jessica Lunsford article. References from verifiable sources should not be deleted in accordance to policy however, I fail to see any strong evidence that would indicate that User: WorkingHard is a sockpuppet. I agree with "Kilo" above. A block on the IP is what was needed for now. Tony the Marine 00:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)