Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/CTeen (2nd nomination) - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Winchester2313 (talk | contribs) at 18:17, 3 September 2021 (→CTeen: opinion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:17, 3 September 2021 by Winchester2313 (talk | contribs) (→CTeen: opinion)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

CTeen

AfDs for this article:

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

CTeen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is written like a promotional advertisement. Many of the references are primary and in-house promotion of their programs e.g., suicide prevention, learning of Torah. Nothing to indicate notability outside of Chabad. Whiteguru (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

I disagree and think it should be left for a while to see how it develops. It definitely needs more work but there are plenty of reliable sources for the information in this page from mainstream press sources outside Chabad.Londoner77 (talk) 02:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Whiteguru (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Whiteguru (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Whiteguru (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

I agree that the page in it's present form needs a lot of work, but there are clearly enough general media references to meet the WP:NOTABILITY standard, as well as merit it's own page. I will try and improve the substance and format when I find some time, but meanwhile feel it should stay. Winchester2313 (talk) 18:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Categories: