Misplaced Pages

User talk:GabrielVelasquez

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by PrimeBOT (talk | contribs) at 20:42, 3 September 2021 (→October 2010: Task 24: removal of a template following a TFD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 20:42, 3 September 2021 by PrimeBOT (talk | contribs) (→October 2010: Task 24: removal of a template following a TFD)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

October 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for making personal attacks against other editors, as you did in this edit summary. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 01:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GabrielVelasquez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Malformed block template,
no real info on reason for block,
looks very fishy to me.
GIVE A REAL REASON.
What is this for and where is the proof?
I don't have a real opportunity to request to be unblocked
because requesting information on this will probably count
as my only allowed request to be unblocked
And I am sure that was done deliberately
So being malformed I ask that it be dismissed.
Also, what ever this is about, two weeks is ridiculously harsh.
Where the improvements made recently considered?

Decline reason:

Far too many personal attacks to consider unblocking at this time. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:23, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bit late but

This is a bit late but it is completely unacceptable to add back personal attacks and threats of this sort . It could easily lead to a block if you weren't already blocked. In some circumstances, it may be acceptable to mention a comment was removed but in that case, the comment was completely worthless and inappropriate so there was no need. Nil Einne (talk) 02:18, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for prolific sockpuppetry compounded with severe, prolonged personal attacks per discussion on ANI. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 02:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)