This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Favonian (talk | contribs) at 20:15, 8 September 2021 (→Theoren Fleury: Already protected by Ched (using responseHelper)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:15, 8 September 2021 by Favonian (talk | contribs) (→Theoren Fleury: Already protected by Ched (using responseHelper))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". | |
All article subway pages
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry --- for 1 year two account socks Red lava 4228 and Yellow sun 4228 has been blocked and tagged from Rgalo10 semi protection too easy for him to block evasion protect this 6 pages for 1 year. 69.94.56.76 (talk) 02:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
That master still continued for disruption by creating a different account as a sockmaster that pages still not protected yet for 2 days ago. 174.244.145.73 (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
RuPaul's Drag Race
Reason: All seasons of the show need to be protected. The progress tables were recently changed to remove a bunch of policy-violating WP:OR, and now there is a sudden spate of new editors creating accounts solely to revert the change.
Daundelin❁ 14:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Feed the Machine Tour
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:16, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—Talk to my owner:Online 06:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Mohammad Irfan (disambiguation)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See recent history; persistent sockpuppetry / attempts at hijacking. AngryHarpy 06:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
List of Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug & Cat Noir episodes
- List of Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug & Cat Noir episodes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Edit war that has been going on for a while now. 2601:644:8D80:AB10:2125:5BC5:58AA:6B6F (talk) 07:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
History of WWE
Reason: Persistent vandalism by multiple unregistered ips and dubious new accounts. These edits are having to be continually reverted by regular reliable users. The page was protected many times in the past but after long gaps these vandalisms have resumed with continuous abusive editing in recent times. You can check yourself on the page revision history. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=History_of_WWE&action=history Dilbaggg (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
ATK Mohun Bagan FC Reserves And Academy
long term temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism and target of long term abuse. Pachu Kannan (talk) 12:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
ATK Reserves And Academy
long term temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism and target of long term abuse. Pachu Kannan (talk) 12:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Lal Mai
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent edits from IP socks of Bttowadch. Ravensfire (talk) 13:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Fitoor (TV series)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Bttowadch sock trying to remove entire reception section because it's too positive for them. Ravensfire (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Krishnadevaraya
Extended confirmed protection: frequent addition of unsourced information and original research. 2409:4061:20C:3565:F8:17DE:BD52:40E8 (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Janusz Korwin-Mikke
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Eridian314 (talk) 14:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Human rights in Afghanistan
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Due to WP:AE, and the current sanction against Afghanistan, as well due to the controversial topic this is. A ECP protection shall be request until further notice. MoonlightVector 14:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Bigg Boss (Hindi Season 15)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Increase protection, likewise Bigg Boss (Hindi season 15) where Ponyo extended protection days ago. ─ The Aafī 16:13, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- and the disruption continues..... ─ The Aafī 16:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Mirnalini Ravi
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (talk to me) 16:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 20:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Sexual slavery in Islam
Hello! I am not sure if I am putting this post this in the correct place, so please excuse me it is not.
The article Sexual slavery in Islam is continually being vandalized by users (often anonymous IPs), who delete large, referenced blocks of texts. The reason for this appear to be that the information is slander against Islam. These edits are always reverted by experienced users, and since these edits are never referenced and instead removes referenced information, it is easy to make the assumption that there is a religios bias from users who which to remove referenced information because they think that this information put their religion in a bad light. Recently, I myself ask for citations from certain information in the article, but this was reverted by a user who claimed these sentences had references, even if they did not. Clearly, the article attracts emotions.
Another issue has come up: the article has long had a neutrality template. Because of the consistent vandalizing, I wondered if the neutrality template was in fact placed their originally because of religious bias. I made this question on the talk page, and the template was indeed removed. It has since been restored. I have to say, that the article is large, I have not read all of it, I am not an expert in the subject, and I cannot be entirely certain whether the neutrality template is warranted or not. And since I recognize that this is a sensitive issue, I simply don't have the energy to involve myself further.
However, it is safe to say that the article is about a very sensitive subject, and I am forced to revert vandalism so often that I wonder; should not an article that are so sensitive and vandalized so often as this one have some sort of protection? Many sensitive articles who are often vandalized have such a protection, at least against IP-editing. So my question is; can this article be protected? It truly needs it, I have to revert vandalism more often on it than any of the other articles on my watchlist. Best greetings,--Aciram (talk) 17:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Semi-protected . I have given it indefinite semi-protection. Berig (talk) 19:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Hillhead High School
Reason: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Henry Heimlich
Temporary protection: Persistent nazi vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Libertarianism
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring and disruptive editing from multiple users and IPs. Oqwert (talk) 18:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Just wanted to say this but I find it kind of ironic the guy who was disruptively editing was the one who suggested it be protected in their edit summary (not saying you're the one disruptively editing Oqwert). Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Misplaced Pages Editor (talk) (Stupidity by me) 19:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Africans in Poland
Semi-protection. Reason: Revert war by multiple IPs Lembit Staan (talk) 18:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Theoren Fleury
Semi-protection: Possible sock, edit warring to add questionable material, with questionable sources GoodDay (talk) 19:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—Talk to my owner:Online 20:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ched. Favonian (talk) 20:15, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Haqqani network
Reason: High level of vandalism and edits by IPs and new inexperienced accounts. This article is getting a lot of traffic now because of current political events (Fall of Kabul (2021)). And with it there have been a lot of editors making inconstructive or bad changes, including edits to the infobox removing sourced material of "allies/enemies" and other info in the lead. Several of these editors are clearly editing them based on their own political agendas. This is a sensitive topic in the long-term related to Afghanistan and South Asia. I strongly believe this article should get Pending Changes protection. This will allow good editors and admins to keep edits in scrutiny, which is what definitely needs to be the case for something sensitive and in current news. WR 20:15, 8 September 2021 (UTC)