Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cdjp1 (talk | contribs) at 08:57, 11 September 2021 (added page views). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
the article doesn't read like an encyclopedic entry at all.
after giving a short definition of what xenophobia is, most of the article is just a collection of events and literally feels like reading through some kind of magazine.
I'm considering leaving a "Missing information" banner on the article. thoughts?