This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spartaz (talk | contribs) at 10:08, 23 October 2021 (→October 2021: Edit). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:08, 23 October 2021 by Spartaz (talk | contribs) (→October 2021: Edit)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Mass changes at Israeli settlement articles
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
hello
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Good Article promotion
|
Congratulations! |
| Thanks for all the work you did in making Tefillin a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated. All the best, – Quadell |
Notification
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Chesdovi_and_Palestinian_edits regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Chesdovi! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Notes
Balady citron, New Jewish Cemetery, Kraków, Moshe Zvi Segal, Abraham Sternhartz, Eliyahu Chaim Rosen, Shlomo Yosef Zevin
Happy Chanukah Chesdovi!
 |  |
File:Joseph H. Hertz.JPG
Warring on Elazar Shach
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Elazar Shach. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. -- Winchester2313 (talk) 16:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- This is a false accusation. Chesdovi (talk) 22:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Shaar Hashamayim Yeshiva
The article Shaar Hashamayim Yeshiva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:ORG
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yaakovaryeh (talk) 10:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Jonatan Meir's book? Chesdovi (talk) 14:11, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Your request to amend your tban
Just recording the conversation here so we have a record in your talk page history of the advice given. This will make reviewing your restrictions easier. Spartaz 15:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- re your comment You don’t get to decide if a block was legitimate or not. It was levied, not overturned, no consensus it was wrong so its legitimate. Therefore your request to vary your tbans is premature. Don’t agree? You can appeal to AE or AN but I suspect its likely to backfire if you do it. Spartaz 23:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- All I wanted to know was if adding that DBG ate pork constituted a T-BAN violation as I was clearly advised that doing so would not be, yet along comes another Admin and slaps on a block without asking me to explain my edits viz-a-viz the T-BAN. Fascinating how one Admin can refuse to accept the decisions of other Admins who had advised back in 2016 what constituted my TBAN and is then supported for sanctioning me for editing in accordance with my T-BAN. Good night. Chesdovi (talk) 00:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Spartaz: I also want to know if adding "Already pregnant with their first child, Amos married Mary Callow, an Irish gentile...etc.." to DBG also violates the TB, as well as whether if adding "Modern Orthodox philosopher Yeshayahu Leibowitz considered Ben-Gurion to have hated Judaism more than any other man he had met" is also a violation. Chesdovi (talk) 22:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Were you blocked for them? If you were did you successfully appeal?Spartaz 09:42, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Spartaz: Yes, I was ultimately blocked for adding information relating to Ben-Gurion's relationship with religion on the premise that it violated a ban on editing the Israel-Palestine conflict area or on Zionism. I did not have the patience to log an official appeal and waited out the block. I now wish to edit at Elazar Shach, which includes his stance on Zionism, and am simply asking that the Zionism (an I guess by extension in this case, the I-P TBAN) ban be lifted on this page alone that I may be allowed to do. Chesdovi (talk) 21:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- You need to demonstrate trouble free editing in a less contentious area before there is any chance of your being released from any of the tbans. Broadly construed means precisely that. Its means you should not touch any article or content with any relation to your tbans in any way. Spartaz 18:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Spartaz: Yes, I was ultimately blocked for adding information relating to Ben-Gurion's relationship with religion on the premise that it violated a ban on editing the Israel-Palestine conflict area or on Zionism. I did not have the patience to log an official appeal and waited out the block. I now wish to edit at Elazar Shach, which includes his stance on Zionism, and am simply asking that the Zionism (an I guess by extension in this case, the I-P TBAN) ban be lifted on this page alone that I may be allowed to do. Chesdovi (talk) 21:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Were you blocked for them? If you were did you successfully appeal?Spartaz 09:42, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
October 2021
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
- Per this thread you acknowledge editing Elazer Shach is a tban vio as you asked for it to be waived to allow you to edit it. You were then warned by me that the previous edits were vios but continue to edit it after being told I would not chance your tbans. You then compound it, you make an edit to a section on zionism in your sandbox. I can't really see that as anything other than a breaching experiment so its time for more reflection on your part about how you can continue to edit without breaching your various tbans Spartaz 10:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)