Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Belarus - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Buidhe (talk | contribs) at 23:28, 23 October 2021 (→FAR for constitution of Belarus: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:28, 23 October 2021 by Buidhe (talk | contribs) (→FAR for constitution of Belarus: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Belarus and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
WikiProject iconBelarus NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus
NAThis page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage WPT


To Do List

To-do list for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Belarus: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2020-09-23


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

WP:BELARUSIANNAMES

Hi everyone, I am proposing some changes to this policy, please join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(Cyrillic)#Belarusian_geographical_place_names,_Part_2. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 18:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Not a policy, and would never be one. It's a draft guideline, long dormant. Might make a good guideline, though. Anyway the distinctions between policies and guidelines matter.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  19:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

FAR notice

I have nominated Hero of Belarus for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 01:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

FAR notice

I have nominated Sviatoslav I for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 23:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed MoS addition on optional stress marking in Belarusian, Russian, Ukrainian, Japanese, Korean, etc.

FYI – Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere.

Please see: Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style#RfC?, for a proposal relating to optional characters/marks for indicating vocal stress, used in some foreign languages, include "ruby" characters for Japanese and Korean, and znaki udareniya marks in Ukrainian and Russian. The short version is that, based on a rule already long found in MOS:JAPAN and consonant with WP:NOTDICT policy, MoS would instruct (in MOS:FOREIGN) not to use these marks (primarily intended for pedagogical purposes) except in unusual circumstances, like direct quotation, or discussion of the marks themselves. Target date for implementation is April 21. PS: This does not relate to Vietnamese tone marks.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  19:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

FAR for constitution of Belarus

I have nominated Constitution of Belarus for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 23:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Categories: