Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Kianna Dior - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:04, 2 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 14:04, 2 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. No sourced claims for notability, WP:PORNBIO per otherwise. The naked assertion that she is "well-known" or "really famous" is not enough. Eluchil404 19:00, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Kianna Dior

Kianna Dior (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 14:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh, right. How? Epbr123 20:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Eh? You didn't say how she fails it. She's well-known in her niche (big-boobed Asians), has made plenty of movies, etc. Xihr 21:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Being "well-known" and making plenty of movies isn't in the WP:PORNBIO criteria. Epbr123 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.