Misplaced Pages

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:41, 10 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Keep arguments do not address concerns. CitiCat 14:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Nyomi Marcela

Nyomi Marcela (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO Epbr123 20:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 22:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless awards/nominations/notability is found Corpx 06:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. She is a well-known adult film actress. -- Trojanian 22:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Being well-known is not the same as being notable. Epbr123 09:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
• Preserve. She is a well-known porn actress. --Kaaveh 03:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Where's the evidence that she's well-known? I just knew someone would copy Trojanian's comment if I didn't rebut it straight away. Epbr123 09:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. While she is well-known, that's not quite the same as notable folks. If you're going to argue for her article being kept, you need to provide some evidence of notability. Tabercil 23:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.