Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-11-06 Woo Jang-choon

< Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal | Cases

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 00:00, 25 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 00:00, 25 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Misplaced Pages Mediation Cabal

Article	Woo Jang-choon
Status	closed
Request date	00:58, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Requesting party	Unknown
Parties involved	Caspian blue and Bukubku
Mediator(s)	Xavexgoem (talk)
Comment	no discussion for a bit

]]

Note: Please limit posts to this page to brief statements about the nature of the dispute until a volunteer adopts the case. Keep ongoing discussions about the topic to the appropriate talk page(s), but feel free to provide links to the talk page(s) where discussion has happened (and may be ongoing) for the convenience of the informal mediator and other parties. This will help keep discussion from fragmenting out across more pages and make it easier for a volunteer to review the case. Thanks!

Request details

Who are the involved parties?

What's going on?

A content/sourcing dispute with dimensions of Korean and Japanese nationalism.

What would you like to change about that?

Disputing parties have been advised at ANI to seek dispute resolution. Filing the request as an uninvolved party in the hope it helps the situation.

Mediator notes

Extended content
Hi. I have opened this case. 23:01, 11 November 2008 (UTC) A few ground rules: I will create sections for each party to comment in. Please address all your comments to me, and not to the other participants. Please keep your statements at 200 words or less, unless asked otherwise. Please keep all comments on facts, and not on the past, present, or future behaviour of any other users All participants are asked to refrain from any editing of the disputed article, the disputed article's talk page, or each other's talk pages until the case is concluded. Any vandalism to the article will be caught by vandalism patrollers, so don't worry about that either. I reserve the right to edit any comments or statements which don't fit within these guidelines. MedCab is not a formal part of the dispute resolution process, and cannot provide binding sanctions. Nevertheless, I ask that everyone involved agree to: Abide by the outcome of this case Immediately move to the next phase of dispute resolution if you are unable to agree with the final outcome Please sign just your username below, with four tildes (~~~~) to indicate your agreement with the ground rules and your participation in the case.

Extended content

Hi. I have opened this case. 23:01, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

A few ground rules:

I will create sections for each party to comment in. Please address all your comments to me, and not to the other participants.
Please keep your statements at 200 words or less, unless asked otherwise.
Please keep all comments on facts, and not on the past, present, or future behaviour of any other users
All participants are asked to refrain from any editing of the disputed article, the disputed article's talk page, or each other's talk pages until the case is concluded. Any vandalism to the article will be caught by vandalism patrollers, so don't worry about that either.
I reserve the right to edit any comments or statements which don't fit within these guidelines.
MedCab is not a formal part of the dispute resolution process, and cannot provide binding sanctions. Nevertheless, I ask that everyone involved agree to:

Abide by the outcome of this case
Immediately move to the next phase of dispute resolution if you are unable to agree with the final outcome

Please sign just your username below, with four tildes (~~~~) to indicate your agreement with the ground rules and your participation in the case.

I've collapsed the above, since Roux had a different style of mediation than mine. However, his ground rules are quite good so I suggest you sign it anyway. That said, I do not reserve the right and will not edit other folks' comments (esp. since I'm moving this to talk) Xavexgoem (talk) 16:20, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Administrative notes

Discussion

I have a question before signing my name and proceeding the meditation. The reason for the meditation is still very obscure to me and is not stated by Bukubku (talk · contribs) so far. Clearly, the process is initiated by Durova, not Bukubku. Bukubku has refused to address his concern for alleged unreferenced "racist contents" to the pertinent talk page. Nobody at WT:JA agreed with the stance of Bukubku that I inserted "racist contents". After I opened a discussion and provided in-line sources, the user was very quite for 5 days unlike his demand. Since I provided inline sources that Bukubku demanded, he did not reject any of my sources. So what else should we have to do for the article? Tell me, Bukubku.--Caspian blue 19:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Caspian, I'm sorry. Now I'm busy. Rough guy appeared the page Woo Jang-choon, so discuss about your source here with third person.--Bukubku (talk) 05:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

You must be kidding. The meditation is what you have wanted, and you have accused me of rejecting your offer for meditation to ANI and everywhere. And this is open by Durova, not you. You did not even say anything about "what we should do with the meditation". I've waited your answer for over 10 days. There is no 3rd person because none knows what we do as long as you don't say. Do not make me waste my time waiting for you further. You did not even say your claim at the talk page of Woo Jang-choon unlike me. You were very busy to falsely accuse me to ANI to look me bad (and nobody agreed you), and you've been busy for over 10 days? If you do not say anything here, you're clearly gaming rule and you're the one who has rejected this Meditation. I would state this meditation would not be proceeded because of your constant refusal to clarify your position.--Caspian blue 16:26, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

← May I ask what position needs to be clarified? I'm still a little new to this dispute :-) Xavexgoem (talk) 17:18, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

My reply is there.(Talk:Woo Jang-choon#medcab)--Bukubku (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)