This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:48, 27 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:48, 27 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep, consensus is that with the sources found the article establishes notability. Davewild (talk) 20:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Steve Titmus
- Steve Titmus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable former regional television presenter turned real-estate agent. Mattinbgn\ 05:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\ 05:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't look like he did anything other than be a good news anchor for a few years. tj9991 (talk | contribs) 05:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
*Delete The article as it stands is unreferenced, so it doesn't deserve to stay.--Lester 08:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, looking at the references that have recently been added, I change my vote from delete to keep. However, the article content needs to be reworked to reflect both positive and negative elements of Titmus' career. As it stands, it's a glowing CV, but that can be fixed.--Lester 20:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete This article fails to establish sufficient notability for an article in WP. All but one of the claims is unsupported by any citation of a suitable source. This looks like original research. Dolphin51 (talk) 08:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep- Passes Misplaced Pages's notability guidelines for people:
- There's already two sources independent of the subject, and doubtless more can be found.
- The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.- presenting the weekday news on a state-wide TV stqation for five years obviously qualifies him for that.
- Per WP:ENTERTAINER, which covers TV personalities, Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions., he was on TV five times a week for half a decade. Passes easily. Reyk YO! 08:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per refs added which meet WP:N and is WP:V. State awards would look better referenced.--Sting Buzz Me... 11:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, secondary coverage exists, was a statewide television personality for a number of years. Lankiveil 12:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC).
- Keep per Lankiveil and Sting. —Giggy 12:38, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep as passing general notability (if it didn't then, it does now). Synergy 14:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Reyk the revised article meets biographical guidelines for notability now. JBsupreme (talk) 20:32, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.