Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ScottishFinnishRadish (talk | contribs) at 15:48, 30 March 2022 (→CM House attack: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aparna Yadav (February 8)

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aparna Yadav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aparna Yadav, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hello, LodoVena! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 07:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aparna Yadav (February 8)

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NBIO for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

This draft does not make a credible claim of significance. This draft would be subject to speedy deletion in article space. If this draft is resubmitted in its current form or a similar form, it should be nominated for deletion.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aparna Yadav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aparna Yadav, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

February 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Tukde Tukde Gang. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 05:09, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Tukde Tukde Gang shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. TrangaBellam (talk) 06:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your edit to Rana Ayyub has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Misplaced Pages. For legal reasons, Misplaced Pages cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Misplaced Pages:Copying text from other sources for more information. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 21:28, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

this block is uncalled for also i am not able to understand why i am blocked. i have always used talk pages in case of any dispute. i would like to challange this block at ANI. RegentsPark are misusing there power in a distructive manner LodoVena (talk) 05:28, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Advice and warning

Most of your editing has been reverted. In your two days here you have violated our copyright policies by adding copyright text to articles, edited tendentiously, and been blocked for edit warring. Please make sure you follow the links I have now provided, and read them carefully. Also, listen to all the advice you've been given, for example here, in order to improve your editing. If it doesn't get any better, I'm afraid you will soon be either topic banned (follow that link too, it's very important!) from Indian politics, or indefinitely blocked from Misplaced Pages. Bishonen | tålk 19:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC).

block is not proper you may have given a notice on my talk about any copyright voilation . i stiil dont know where i have violated copyright policy. if done in unknowingly , i will take it back LodoVena (talk) 05:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

LodoVena, please read the block notice carefully. You were blocked for edit warring, not for copyright violations. If you want to see where you have violated the copyright policy, look at the history of the article linked to in the copyright violation warning above. You might also want to take a look at wikipedia's policies before continuing to edit. --RegentsPark (comment) 13:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

regent .....bichonen is required to answer this, why are you jumping in... anyway , i have never violated 3rr rule LodoVena (talk) 17:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabka Saath Sabka Vikas (February 14)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, LodoVena! I'm LodoVena. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. LodoVena (talk) 04:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Republic TV, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 07:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on NDTV. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Newslinger talk 14:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Controversial topic area alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 07:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

this alert is for which page I that edited ?LodoVena (talk) 12:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

• You got the alert because you have been editing biography articles, such as Chandrashekhar Azad Ravan and Yogi Adityanath. It applies to all biography articles. Bishonen | tålk 12:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC).

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages related to India and/or Pakistan.

You have been sanctioned for persistent tendentious editing. This use of Talk:The Kashmir Files as a forum is the last straw.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | tålk 08:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

@LodoVena Do you understand that your edits are in a violation of the topic ban as described above? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 15:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Ivanvector (/_Edits) 15:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement action appeal by <Username>-2022-03-17T06:19:00.000Z">

Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved administrators" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.

To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).

Appealing user

] (] · ] · ] · ] · filter log · ] · block log) – LodoVena (talk) 06:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC)"> ">

Sanction being appealed

<Text>

Administrator imposing the sanction

] (] · ] · ] · ] · ] · ] · ] · ])

Notification of that administrator

The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.

Statement by <Username>-Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_<Username>">

<Your text>

Statement by <Username>_2-Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_<Username>">

Statement by (involved editor 1)">

Statement by (involved editor 2)">

Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by <Username>-Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_<Username>">

Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.

Statement by (uninvolved editor 1)">

Statement by (uninvolved editor 2)">

Result of the appeal by <Username>-Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_<Username>">

This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.

CM House attack

What happened here? first you added content. Now you removed? was it a mistake? Venkat TL (talk) 15:10, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

It is a clear breach of their topic ban, outlined above. Bishonen, care to take a look? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)