This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:07, 31 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:07, 31 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:19, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
Imperial Mark
Very likely an advertisement, no apparent notability. See also comments on talk page. Sandstein 10:14, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable, if nothing else. --Apyule 12:02, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per above --Lomedae 13:11, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete My comments on the talk page were: Is there any independent source for this? Most of the information seems to be lifted directly from the commercial web site. Doing a Google check shows various press releases from the company behind the Imperial Mark, but nothing AFAICS from anyone independent. A news item such as this: originates from IC, the International Charter Organisation themselves. A search of Omega's own site reveals no mention of the Mark, there is likewise nothing on the Harrods site, nor as far as I can see on the Rolex site. DavidFarmbrough 09:00 (BST) 15 Aug 2005
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.