Misplaced Pages

User talk:Praxidicae

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Celestina007 (talk | contribs) at 22:00, 29 April 2022 (→Why: Comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:00, 29 April 2022 by Celestina007 (talk | contribs) (→Why: Comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is Praxidicae's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29Auto-archiving period: 14 days 
"Cause I've met some people, okay? Real people, and I've got to tell you, a lot of them are fucking idiots" - Selina Meyer

Seeking for a mentor

Hello, Praxidicae! By chance I came across very good reviews about you and about your work on Misplaced Pages. I am a fairly experienced user of the Russian-language Misplaced Pages, I have the status of "auto-confirmed participants, loading, rolling back, patrolling" participants. I really want to develop in the English-language Misplaced Pages, to be useful, to implement interesting and necessary articles from Kazakhstan here. I am at a studio for learning English, so creating articles, and most importantly, challenging the verdicts of administrators is very difficult for me. I would really like to find an English-speaking friend and mentor. I am a very diligent and responsible student. I am ready to help with articles, search for the blind, learn, correct my mistakes. Now I need help to improve the articles of two Kazakhstanis that the country is proud of. They have put Kazakhstan on the world's innovation card. Perhaps you could take your time and share some tips and tricks. The administrator who transferred my articles to Draft, unfortunately, did not respond to my message. Thanks in advance! And I apologize for the disturbance. Deviloper (talk) 07:52, 9 June 2021‎ (UTC)

Hey!

What specific objections do you have with the edit? Thanks. KlayCax (talk) 14:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Article for deletion: Che route

Thanks for reverting my deletion of the Afd tag. It wasn't intentional, just carelessness after making a very large edit. I did most of it in the Sandbox, and pasted the whole of my last Sandbox version over the whole of the English article, without checking that I was deleting something important. Sorry: it won't happen again (I hope). Athel cb (talk) 16:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Tracey Medeiros

Uh, what happened here? I was doing a round-robin move requested at WP:RM/TR, but I couldn't do step 3 (filling space at Draft:Tracey Medeiros again) because you had created a duplicate of the article I had just moved. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

I was trying to clean up the bad references - this really shouldn't have been moved and should've stayed as a redirect. Guess I'll just AFD it now. CUPIDICAE💕 21:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Ah; I'm guessing I moved the page while you were editing it. The author was already warned about publishing it in its current state, and the move was only prevented by technical reasons (redirect in the way), so I performed the move (I don't believe the subject is notable, and I wouldn't have published it myself). I've redirected Draft:Tracey Medeiros. Thanks for your work! Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your comment

Hi, I saw your comment on my wall and that you deleted it. First up, hi, I review AFD daily and look for articles about women, as part of my efforts to address gender imbalance on Misplaced Pages. I had not noticed who nominated them for AfD. So just to reassure you that this is nothing to do with you, and just something I've been doing for a while. 

CT55555 (talk) 23:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
And I was quick to write that, because I was concerned that anyone would think I was giving them a hard time here, that is not my style at all.
So just some extra background, in the hope that it will reassure you, I am an active member of Women in Red. About 19% of biographies on Misplaced Pages are about women, yet about 41% of biographical articles nominated for deletion are about women. (Source: Gender bias on Misplaced Pages). So over recent months I've altered my actions here from not just creating articles about women, but trying to save appropriate ones from the deletion process.
If you look through my history, you'll see that I'm active at AfD usually trying to improve articles about women and people of colour in an attempt to make wikipedia more inclusive.
If you take a look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Ideas you'll see under "articles for deletion" my explanation of my actions, predating our interactions today.
I know wikipedia can be brutal at times, but I really want to reassure you my actions are not targeted at you and I'm sorry that you felt they were. CT55555 (talk) 23:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Sockpuppet?

Hello,
We have been in touch two years ago as part of Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Chdondon1990. I have recently observed some activities which reminds me about what has happened at the time:

  • Mila vecto and Mr Nicolaus, Pierrich and مأزن are creating articles, mainly biographies of Tunisian actors and articles about MMA (for ex. UAE Warriors which I saw you have considered for deletion). They are mainly active in WP:en, WP:fr and WP:simple and keep on translating (or trying to translate) the others' articles in multiple languages.
  • Georges st and Slimphotographer are simultaneously uploading pictures for the same articles, and always logging OTRS tickets (quite unusual for newbies).

What do you think? Does it deserve to reopen a new investigation? Moumou82 (talk) 07:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Absolutely! I knew they were evading a block. I'm currently fighting off another bout of covid, so don't have the energy to file myself, though. CUPIDICAE💕 12:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Take care of yourself. I realize they are not much active in WP:en so I expect we cannot have an investigation here, so will keep them under my radar for now. Moumou82 (talk) 13:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Katie Brennan

Ok i reverted yours and you reverted mine. Easily sorted. What does RS mean in the comment to your reversion of my edits? Real life sources?

Please advise.

Thanks

Benawu2 (talk) 08:49, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Archana Jois

Hello Praxidicae. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Archana Jois, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Hi Prax. Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Archana Jois was in early 2019. Special:Contributions/Robert_McClenon - someone whose opinion we both respect - has requested that this not be speedily deleted, and I am happy to trust that request. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Rollback use

Hi, I noticed you using the rollback feature on what appeared to be a good faith addition of a source: , and had a quick scroll through your recent contributions and saw similar uses of the rollback feature: reverting the removal of sources from a lead: (a good faith edit that appears reasonable in view MOS:LEADCITE), and this good faith but unsourced edit: .

WP:ROLLBACKUSE says that the rollback feature is generally meant for vandalism and such things, and that Use of standard rollback for any other purposes – such as reverting good-faith changes which you happen to disagree with – is likely to be considered misuse of the tool. Any of those three edits I mentioned above you could have reason to disagree with, but if you disagree with them it would be better to explain why in an edit summary. I think new users seeing their edits reverted without any explanation might tend to drive them away from the project. Endwise (talk) 15:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

MY explanation was on the talk page for the second, they're also not a new user and it did look like vandalism and the first was a mistake however that user is an actual spammer, so it's moot. CUPIDICAE💕 15:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
And no this does not appear to be a good faith edit, completely changing the name of the article. CUPIDICAE💕 15:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

You Have Been Reported for Violating Misplaced Pages's 3RR Rule

You have reverted changes on the Soborno Isaac Bari page at least 3 times in under a 24-hour time period, thus violating the 3RR rule. You have been reported for edit warring and will now face sanctions and blocking.

Thanks

Thanks for the R2 on Patolin. As soon as I saw the tag on my watchlist, I realized I forgot a clean-up step. Fastily deleted it before I could hit the "thanks" button. Everyone is so quick! Schazjmd (talk) 20:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

No worries, I have a filter I use for RC that specifically is for new page moves by users who probably shouldn't be moving them so that popped up fast for me. :) CUPIDICAE💕 20:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

You can use a cup of tea after dealing with those sockpuppets Robert McClenon (talk) 23:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Some words of wisdom

Take it easy bro. You've already made enough moolah to have a comfortable retirement. We all know that you've been in the biz for years, and it's hard work. Also forgot to say, thanks for generating all those of potential clients and tracking down competitors, giving yourself and everybody an endless stream of lucrative work to do. But keep in mind, life is short, enjoy it while it lasts. Spend a bit more time away from the screen with family, friends, pets, community. In your dotage, you won't regret quality off-wiki time when your reminisce back on your life.

"Man is like a breath; his days are like a passing shadow." Psalm 144:4. SomeAncientSage (talk) 21:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

The fuck are you on about? CUPIDICAE💕 21:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Also lol because people criticize me for my lack of content work, so what is it that I'm supposed to get paid for? Enquiring, unemployed minds would like to know. :) CUPIDICAE💕 21:24, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
I assume these are rhetorical questions? --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kind of, I'm sure they'll be back, angry about their block. I wish I got paid to fuck around on Misplaced Pages. I'm sure my husband would like that too. CUPIDICAE💕 21:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Mistaken speedy deletion tag of Hyram Yarbro?

Per WP:SPAMPAGE, pages can be speedily deleted using {{db-spam}} when they are blatant examples of advertising. However, I'm not sure how you could possibly think the page Hyram Yarbro meets any of the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Identifying blatant advertising or at WP:G11. The criteria is meant for pages that are unambiguously and solely attempting to promote a product, service, or individual and has no other goal at all such that it would need to be fundamentally rewritten to be encyclopedically acceptable (rather than tweaked in a few areas for tone for example). Just making sure this tag wasn't in error? Alduin2000 (talk) 21:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Just a single example: ged 18, Yarbro moved from Arizona to Honolulu, Hawaii in 2014 to study at Brigham Young University. There, he studied international cultural studies, peacebuilding, anthropology, and entrepreneurship. While at college, Yarbro experienced premature aging and became passionate about skincare products when he used them and saw how effective they could be. He went on to work as a make-up artist at Saks Fifth Avenue. Whilst working there, he realised that consumers would buy expensive products to ensure they had the best skincare and began to question whether they were worth the price. Seeing that there weren't any resources online about skincare directed towards consumers, he decided to start his channel on YouTube with an ingredients-driven approach to providing advice on the subject. is nothing short of absolute promo. CUPIDICAE💕 21:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
This is biographical information that is relevant to an encyclopedic article, and reflects content in numerous reliable sources. Nonetheless, even if this is off in tone or is undue weight to what amounts to trivia (not the case imo but still), this doesn't really address what I'm saying. Articles are only eligible to be deleted under G11 if they are (quoting here) "exclusively promotional". In Misplaced Pages:Identifying blatant advertising, this is expanded on as "Blatant advertising is an article or a page that's created, worded, and designed for the sole and intentional purpose of selling or promoting an idea, product, or service." I think tone or due weight issues in the article (if they exist) clearly do not amount to the page being exclusively promotional. Anyway, I was just checking. I think the tag is clearly in error but if it wasn't a mistake it will be decided upon by an admin. Have a good day. Alduin2000 (talk) 22:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
It is heavily promotional beyond saving. Obviously if an admmin disagrees, they'll decline it. In the mean time, I'm not removing it. CUPIDICAE💕 22:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Sorry

I'm sorry for removing the sources that you added to the article, I was so caught up in fixing it that I didn't even realize it reverted your sources. X-Editor (talk) 23:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

I can't tell if you or I doubled them or what, so no biggie. CUPIDICAE💕 23:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Review a Draft Article

Hello Please review this draft Article Draft:Tonni Laha Roy if he notable on Misplaced Pages move his name. I think he is notable because he acted notable television show. Shweta Bhattacharya there are same catogry actress please check my draft Article Tanvirnahid565 (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

I do not expedite reviews or review on demand, sorry. CUPIDICAE💕 20:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Kyla Carter

Thanks for getting that speedied. I tried earlier today, but was basically told there was nothing wrong with the article or the creator. I was going to take the whole mess to ANI, but now I don't have to. :) Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

huh?! Who said there's nothing wrong with that article? CUPIDICAE💕 16:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
When I requested speedy this morning (I had it on the watchlist) on the basis that it had been deleted following an earlier AfD, the attending admin declined, saying it can't have been the same as the AfD'd one because it had some new sources. I tried to explain that it had in the meantime been republished several times, and the creator in any case had a COI and shouldn't have been publishing directly anyway, but nothing doing.
This may have been partly because it was this time under 'Kyla Carter' (moved there from 'The Kyla carter'), whereas much of the earlier shenanigans was under 'Kyla carter', so possibly not immediately obvious unless you knew where to look. With all the moves and draftifyings etc., the histories were a mess.
I also have a feeling there may be some puppetry behind this, going back to the earlier AfD (albeit a few years ago now), and I was thinking I might have to open a SPI, but now the creator has been indeffed anyway, so maybe that's the end of it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
I can't go too far into it but a simple google search of said user will provide a lot of insight (and they should absolutely be blocked indef because quite frankly it's creepy.) PRAXIDICAE💕 16:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Might have a look, if I feel the need for a good scare in the small hours.
Meanwhile, in the first edit of this version Draft:Kyla Carter the creator seems to imply they are the article subject.
Odd. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:33, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Amit Riyaan - deletion discussion

Thanks for your note - I sent it to AfD as I agree there are concerns with the article. -- Tawker (talk) 18:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

I don't think we read the same article, it's nothing short of a poorly sourced advertisement, regurgitated from the standard Indian churnalism. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Article review

Hello Praxidicae, Can you review my article Draft:Ajlan Alajlan? thank you. Dahomvic (talk) 18:45, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

I do not review articles on demand or expedite reviews as there are thousands waiting. But if I were to review it right now, I'd decline it as an advertisement and poorly sourced. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:46, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thanks Praxidicae. I'm an editor at the Arabic Wiki, but 90% of the sources are Arabic. I Do not use the article as an advertisement because the person is very famous in the region. What should I do? Dahomvic (talk) 19:09, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi; I'm an uninvolved editor, and for clarity sake I didn't even look at the draft, but if what Praxidicae says is true, then I'd suggest reading WP:NPOV and WP:RS to address these concerns. Thanks! — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 19:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
@Dahomvic—Courtesy ping. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 19:24, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks @3PPYB6 My point is the lack of sources that are in English maybe only dozens, unlike Arabic sources. My question is can I use Arabic sources? Dahomvic (talk) 19:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
@Dahomvic—Of course! Misplaced Pages accepts any source that is reliable, even if it is in a different language. You'll just have to translate the Arabic into English. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 20:05, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

LH Research woes

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Geoman3 (talk) 15:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)"}}

Questions

Currently, a college student who is working on the mental health article with you as well. I saw that you got rid of the bipolar disorder section that I added just wanted to know why? Considering the mayo clinic is a scholarly article that is reviewed by multiple doctors. And bipolar disorder is a major problem that should be discussed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truegod123 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

You added an entire section that basically said "exercising cures all" which is unsupported by RS and please take a read of WP:MEDRS before editing again. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Deletion Process

Hello Praxidicae,

thank you for taking the time to respond to my questions, as I mentioned to you, I am NOT being paid, I really would like to know what can I edit on the article to make it accepeted. I have the media stories, medical journals, what else is needed? Thank you.Andrecanada (talk) 16:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

So what's your connection to her, then Andrecanada? PRAXIDICAE💕 16:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for asking Praxdicae,
I am her husband, and I promised you that no profit is being made from this horrifc accident. is that a cause for the deletion ? Andrecanada (talk) 16:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
The warning also includes WP:COI which I suggest you read. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
ok, I saw all the way on te bottom, I have no problem disclosing it, It is no secret that I am a huge burn advocate since my wifes accident, if I add a disclaimer. would that make the article approved? also, two users just message me, offering to write the article, since they follow her story and felt compelled after seeing the deletion request, what do you advise? i want to follow the rules. Thank you for your time and knowledge. Andrecanada Andrecanada (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
No because it still doesn't mean she's notable and this is still a case of WP:BLP1E. You disclosing is a matter of policy, it just means you won't be blocked for an undisclosed COI. It isn't insulation against other actions or guarantee of an article. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Praxie, i see that you edit some parts of the article, fine, but why continue to suggest deletion? now the only info there is the medical facts. how can we come to an agreement ? Andrecanada (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
I've already adequately explained why. I suggest you stick to one account or tell whomever you are editing alongside with to cease disruptively removing the tag before you both wind up blocked. Also my name is not Praxie. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
I dont know the other person editng the account, I have not remove any tags, Praxdicae. Lets see what the discussion decides. Thank you. Andrecanada (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Looks like User:Andrecanada has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 18:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

may i know why my page is gonna deleted https://en.wikipedia.org/Fahaad_Bhat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiputta (talk • contribs) 17:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Neonatal nursing reverts

Hi - @Praxidicae: Can you help me identify copyvios and npov issues in Eflake123's recent edits to the Neonatal_nursing article? Trying to help a student learn how to successfully contribute. Wholesale reverts aren't really helpful or recommended. Thanks for your attention to this article. I think there's some goof stuff in the student's edits if we take the time to work with them rather than revert. DarthVetter (talk) 14:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Please Review The Eagle Online

hello Praxidicae, please sir, you recently deleted an artilce i created not knowing the time i took to create it , if you are in Nigeria you will know that these are all reliable news source . i gave good cituation , make a review by doing a google search of the online news site. thanks Kenpmi (talk) 15:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I gave you the opportunity to work on it in draft, you chose to ignore that. So now it'll either be speedily deleted or i'll afd it. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:43, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Once was enough

Hi, Prax. Once was enough for me. Bishonen | tålk 16:32, 26 April 2022 (UTC).

I mean hey, I vote for an indef. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Praxie! ROTFLOL! Yes, your name shall henceforth be Praxie. Who's Arturo? Bishie | tålk 17:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC).
Arturo is our benevolent LTA. He's more just LT, less A. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:59, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Waris Ali Shah

Hi, please check Talk:Waris Ali Shah before reverting. Thank you. Dove's talk (talk) 18:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

How about you check it and actually read my edit summaries. I don't plan on reverting you until it's blacklisted but I will be filing an SPI shortly. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

We conflicted, and I am not sure of the solution

Please see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Azaan Sami Khan. You redirected Azaan Sami Khan and I was sending to AfD. I am unsure how to solve this. I have no strong feelings either way, buty you have the toolkit to solve it whereas I do not, so your help will be key. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Faddle 🇺🇦 20:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

It gets more 'amusing' because Ishq E Laa received the AfD nomination. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Faddle 🇺🇦 20:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
I was wondering what happened, you can restore the template there since they'll probably just revert me anyway. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:12, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
I'll have a crack at it. Wish me luck 🇺🇦 Fiddle Faddle 🇺🇦 20:13, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
I think I have sorted it out. I really didn't feel strongly about your redirect. It is now "correctly" at AfD. By which I mean it is correctly set up for folk to discuss. I'm out of breath now! 🇺🇦 Fiddle Faddle 🇺🇦 20:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Have a look

Hi Prax, please take sometime and have a look at Pawandeep Rajan and Arunita Kanjilal. Do you find something unusual? ─ The Aafī 18:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Why

Good day Praxidicae, why didn’t you afd the articles I recently created rather than moving them to draft for improvement stating they need more citations. I found nothing wrong with the article and at least you should have given other editors to contribute their thought either the article should be keep or delete. --Gabriel601 (talk) 21:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Because I was giving you the opportunity to work on them in draft space, should you move them back, I will indeed AFD them and they will be deleted. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
I reached out to you politely and you are responding to me like a threat without given me a Good reason why you moved the article which passes WP:GNG. If anyone should be getting you upset here on Misplaced Pages or outside of Misplaced Pages I think you need to calm down and fix it than talking to people rudely who reached out to you in a polite manner. What opportunity are you giving me ? Theirs nothing wrong with the article and your reason wasn’t a good reason article has to be shifted to draft. No reason why article should be deleted and you are sounded that as a threat to me that if I move it back to main space, you will afd and they will be deleted like you got every other editor in control of you. That is too bad you have to change your manner. You can go ahead and AFD while I put it back on mainspace for other editor contribution. --Gabriel601 (talk) 22:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
@Gabriel601 (talk page stalker) May I suggest that instead of having an argument you submit the drafts as they are now for a WP:AFC review, or improve them first and then do it. That means that others will look and offer constructive advice. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Faddle 🇺🇦 22:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Oh thank you @Timtrent but I already move the page to main space before you just told me this. I think he should AFD it as he said and give his reason why it should be AFD--Gabriel601 (talk) 22:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
@Gabriel601 What will happen will happen. Your move has a WP:POINT feel about it, but you must do what you must do. I have, however, left you a helpful note on another of your drafts, so far unsubmitted. It would be helpful if you took notice of it, please.
Arguments on Misplaced Pages serve no purpose, save to raise blood pressure. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Faddle 🇺🇦 22:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Thank you @Timtrent I also left a note on my talk page. I appreciate your advice on being no argument it saves health and that is why I don’t edit much on Misplaced Pages. I’m not always active because I do value my health. I will be leaving the article you commented for now till when it’s sounds right to be improve to suit Misplaced Pages article but the politician is a Good article.--Gabriel601 (talk) 23:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Gabriel601, I don’t appreciate you acting as though you are the victim here and also, I believe you are trying too hard to make Praxidicae look like a villain. please stop already. Take a look at your article creations every single creation of yours has been promotional in nature thus vindicating Praxidicae and indicative of the fact that she is very much apt. The difference between Praxi & I, is that she is all encompassing, nigh all knowing, but you see, as for me, Nigeria related articles are my forte and I can unequivocally say all the articles you created are all promotional articles on non notable persons. I’m literally the most renowned editor dealing with Nigeria related articles in the history of the English Misplaced Pages so please respectfully do simmer down, as all the sources you used are all unreliable pieces from reliable sources, the rest are press releases or mere announcements, God's honest truth if you keep creating promotional articles I would be left with no other choice than to file an official report. It is in your best interest to change for the best forthwith. Furthermore if you can explain why you are a sleeper spa promo account that would be great. Celestina007 (talk) 22:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)