This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Miss Mondegreen (talk | contribs) at 00:47, 18 February 2007 (edit on my subpage). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:47, 18 February 2007 by Miss Mondegreen (talk | contribs) (edit on my subpage)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Please leave me a new message
Any edits deemed to be "trolling" are subject to being reverted at my whim. Thank you.
| This is NMChico24's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 Archives |
|---|
| 1 2 3 |
Thanks!
Thanks for the revert to my user page! delldot | talk 00:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Vandal
User:Freddy Krueger vandalised Freddy Krueger again! I've been reverting but he keeps doing it. Please stop him. P.S. Good to see a fellow CVU member. Brain40
- Phew...Brain40
South Carolina article
I'm new and trying to figure out the article submission guidelines; obviously I have it all screwed up. I also tried to answer your question on notability, but not sure I posted right there either. After reading the instructions, I'm no better off than I was before. I will fix what needs to be fixed, but I'm not sure what it is. You can also e-mail me at truck6alpha@aol.com if that helps. Thanks.
71.171.65.202
Sorry, i am new to wikipedia and i was just trying to learn editing. Thanks, 71.171.65.202 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.73.39.221 (talk) 04:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC).
Thank you to welcome me
BBSM
Good to meet you
It was my pleasure to revert your user page - I am sure you often do the same! Take care. Stizz 13:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
edit on my subpage
I realize that you probably thought that you were preventing vandalism here, and I hadn't been logged in, which is what caused the misunderstanging, but your edit summary said "Rollback blanking of large portions of text with no explanation". While I hadn't been logged in (my mistake, timeout), I did provide an explanitory edit summary that showed extensive knowledge of the page and of the user's edits, and this was a user subpage not linked to anything and the chance of vandalism that also created new content was beyond low. It might have been a better idea to leave me a note about the IP edit on my talk page. That way you know that I know about the change, whereas if you go ahead and revert my edits, if I have a heavy watchlist or don't log in often, I may not find out about your edits until the next time I go to that page, and I may not then remember the change I made. I do appreciate the vigilance, but I think you may have been a little too vigilant in this case. Thanks, Miss Mondegreen 00:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)