Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dejvid (talk | contribs) at 05:45, 17 June 2022 (→The lead seems logic-less). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. History High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. LGBTQ+ studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Gender studies High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles Cleanup : edit to see Collaborate : see /Collaboration Copyedit : edit to see Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender Expand : edit to see Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes Merge : edit to see Notability : edit to see NPOV : edit to see Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia Photo : see Misplaced Pages requested photographs of gender studies Split : History of feminism Stubs : see Gender studies stubs Translate : see /translation Update : edit to see Verify : Riot grrrl Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Sexology and sexuality High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Fashion High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Sociology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Wiki Loves Pride
This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2016.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride

Section sizes Section size for Transgender history (65 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 4,112 4,112 Historiography 4,732 4,732 Africa 49 15,518 Ancient Egypt 1,426 1,426 North Africa 1,702 1,702 West Africa 1,297 1,297 East Africa 5,859 5,859 Southern Africa 24 5,185 Traditional Bantu third genders 1,584 1,584 Botswana 1,401 1,401 South Africa 2,176 2,176 Americas 16 61,630 North America 22 45,653 Early history 6,234 6,234 Canada 7,114 7,114 Haiti 4,514 4,514 Mexico 5,650 5,650 United States 22,119 22,119 South America 23 15,961 Argentina 246 246 Bolivia 529 529 Brazil 5,973 5,973 Chile 5,153 5,153 Colombia 926 926 Peru 1,554 1,554 Uruguay 1,557 1,557 Asia 11 32,920 West Asia (the Middle East) 156 7,702 Arabian peninsula 1,624 1,624 Iran 2,175 2,175 Israel and Palestine 2,588 2,588 Ottoman Empire 1,159 1,159 East Asia 18 8,751 China 5,678 5,678 Japan 3,055 3,055 South and Southeast Asia 33 16,456 Cambodia 487 487 Indian subcontinent 6,807 6,807 Indonesia 2,382 2,382 Philippines 2,695 2,695 Thailand 4,052 4,052 Europe 13 64,724 Earliest history 3,349 3,349 Ancient Greece, Ancient Rome, and Byzantium 9,221 9,221 Early Scandinavia, Viking-era Norse 2,913 2,913 Middle Ages 8,674 14,774 Medieval Christian church 6,100 6,100 Balkans 2,145 2,145 Belgium 932 932 Denmark 2,713 2,713 France 4,850 4,850 Germany 7,082 7,082 Italy 2,405 2,405 Russia 1,831 2,191 Itelmens of Siberia 360 360 Soviet Union 4,873 4,873 Spain 2,353 2,353 Turkey 1,140 1,140 United Kingdom 3,770 3,770 Oceania 14 8,140 Australia 3,453 3,453 New Zealand, the Cook Islands, Niue 1,544 1,544 Samoa, Tonga, Fiji and Tahiti 3,129 3,129 See also 513 513 References 747 747 Total 193,036 193,036

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Graydoiron.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Attribution

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

The original version of the article was created for the most part by taking portions of text from LGBT history and creating an article structure with headings somewhat mimicking that article where appropriate. For the section on #United States of America, information was mostly summarized and occasionally copied from History of transgender people in the United States. Other than that, short portions were copied or paraphrased from these articles:

• from Hijra (South Asia) (version 725677002) for the section on ancient Asia.
• from Magnus Hirschfeld (724927442)for the title of his 1910 book in the Germany section.
• from Chevalier d'Eon (723122921) for the section on France.
• from Transgender in China (723673135) for the section on China.
• from Gender identities in Thailand (708833883) for the section on Thailand.

Mathglot (talk) 02:18, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Chevalier d'Eon

@Ryk72: The section on the Chevalier d'Eon was removed from the article by with the summary, "Chevalier d'Eon is not widely recognised as transgender in the modern sense."

What sense is that? The Chevalier d'Eon lived 49 years as a man and 33 years as woman, while claiming to have been assigned female at birth, although that was fiction. He was transgender by the definition in the first sentence of Transgender. By what justification do you feel he should not be included here? Please revert this change, or explain. Mathglot (talk) 02:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Furthermore, nothing that came before "modern" times would count as "transgender in the modern sense" by definition. But this is an article about transgender history, and history starts in the past with ancient and less developed concepts than the ones we are used to. The modern concept of transgender didn't spring forth in our time with no antecedents, in fact, it goes back centuries or millennia, as near as we are able to determine. That the word did not exist before 1965, or the modern concept did not exist before some recent point in time, is not an argument for excluding the historical developments that led to the modern concept, any more than it would be in the history of other ideas.

That would be like excluding from an article about "The History of Banking" people trading cowrie shells or salt for other goods because this is "not banking in the modern sense." Of course it's not, but it was an ancient precursor which led eventually to banking, after many changes and evolution over time. In the same way, there are ancient precursors to the modern concept of transgender, and they are fully appropriate to include in an article entitled Transgender history, including the case of the Chavlier d'Eon, as well as that of Herculine Barbin who also deserves a mention.

If there is no objection, I plan to restore text about these two individuals to the section on France in a couple of weeks. Mathglot (talk) 06:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the comprehensive response; it is genuinely appreciated. Some worthwhile points are made, and I think we might reach a consensus for some inclusion here. One particular issue, however, is that there is currently no mention of Transgender in the main portion of the Chevalier d'Eon article; there is categorisation, but nothing supportive of in the article text. From some initial research, I think there is likely sufficient reliable sourcing to address this at that article, which would then support an inclusion here. I do, however, think it likely that we would need to couch such inclusions (both here and there) in a "modern interpretations are ..." or "modern scholars consider ..." framework to WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV. I would be immediately supportive of an addition here covering Havelock Ellis' term "eonism", and/or covering The Beaumont Society, both with specific reference to the Chevalier. As a side note, I'd also be interested in including more in this article on the experiences of non-famous transgender persons, perhaps with some information on legal status & cultural acceptance over time; and also more on the experiences in various cultures. Thoughts? - Ryk72 08:30, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Chile

Expanded Transgender history#Chile section with some information about Marcia Torres. It could probably be tightened up a bit, and needs another citation. Pinging SusunW. Mathglot (talk) 01:17, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Mathglot added Carvajal citation. SusunW (talk) 02:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Restructuring

This article was divided into a coarse binary of ==Ancient history== and the ==Modern period==, specified as beginning with The Enlightenment, which were then subdivided into geographical sections, in which content was then ordered chronologically again. However, many groups the article discusses stretch across that arbitrary dividing line, like American categories (two-spirits; muxe, etc), Balkan sworn virgins, hijras, some African categories, etc, which existed from the pre-European-Enlightenment period into the modern period or even present day. As the article became more complete, content about these would end up fragmented or duplicated in each L2's L3 section (e.g., both in ==Ancient history== ===India=== and ==Modern period== ===India===, or else one or the other L3 would be incomplete). I restructured the article so it simply looks at the chronology of each area all in one section . -sche (talk) 23:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

This makes good sense. It’s somewhat at the expense of an overall chronological view, and in particular, at the top level there is no simple way to see how far back it goes. How about a new top-level section called "History" (which could be divided into, perhaps, Antiquity, Modern, 21st-century) that would give a brief overview chronologically? Mathglot (talk) 02:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Well, obviously not "History", doh; the article is already "Transgender history"; so something else. Not timeline, because that would imply a listing of individual events as is typical for timeline articles; maybe, "Chronology"? "Evolution"? Something else? Mathglot (talk) 11:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

That's a good point that the article doesn't start with the earliest stuff first overall, though the old structure didn't either — the first paragraph is the same in both versions, about the earliest African trans/third-gender categories, with both versions not getting to the oldest(?) Assyria/Sumer stuff until later. And each geographic section does now generally start with the oldest stuff in that area, so people get a sense of how far back stuff goes in each area.
My main concern with adding another section would be duplicating content which is already a summary of all the more specific articles it's present in ("LGBT rights in Peru", "History of transgender people in the United States", etc), and which is in turn already summarized here in the lead. But maybe the lead is the answer—we could rewrite the lead (which I intend to expand to summarize the modern stuff soon, unless someone else wants to beat me to it) to be the chronological summary, starting with the furthest-back-anywhere stuff. -sche (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Things are coming along. A few big things are still missing from the body, but the lead now summarizes most of what's there, and in a mostly chronological way. If/when the remaining lacunae in the body are filled, I think I may try sandboxing a chronological-ish re-ordering of it, to see if I or anyone else can think of a way to make that work, and then see whether it looks better or worse than the current layout. At the moment I am trying to cut out unnecessary details, so the article doesn't become too big. -sche (talk) 03:47, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Todo: sections that need work

I intend to work on these issues, but am listing them here in case I don't have time to.

-sche (talk) 07:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Just a general shout-out to the great job -sche is doing on the article. I've particularly noticed the much needed, expanded lead, as well as additional expanded sections in the body. On the to-do list: France was once included, as in this version, which had information on the Chevalier d'Eon and Herculine Barbin. Barbin was removed here, and Eon here. (The same editor removed Elagabalus here, but it's since been restored.) I added the content back into the section on France, and tagged them {{cn}} (citations available at the source articles). Mathglot (talk) 00:57, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, for the shout-out and the restoration of the French content! :) -sche (talk) 00:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Updated to-do list:

• Overall:
  • evaluate and, if low-quality, replace sources copied from other articles (e.g., "Gender Dynamix"?), here and in the other articles.
  • possibly change from countries-as-L3s to e.g. regions more often (this is already done with e.g. the Balkans)? downside: laws may vary very much from nation to nation (but this could be handled by subsections for nations within smaller-than-continents geo units). maybe a bad idea.
• Africa:
  • add other countries' history (in ===General=== if there'd otherwise be too many short sections)
  • add West African general/early history?
  • some lower-quality books say Phoenicans in North Africa had third-gender priests; do high-quality ones?
  • were there trans male roles?
  • are there any pictures to add?
• North America:
  • are there records of trans people in Canada in the 1700s, 1800s, 1900s, as there are in the US?
  • condense/trim less-important Canadian stuff further? (this is an overview article; compare other sections)
  • add modern Mexican history.
  • add Canadian and/or Mexican pictures?
• South America:
  • add or expand (and move out of national subsections, to top?) pre- and colonial era history.
  • as with Canada, look for examples from between the colonial period and now, such as existed in the US.
  • pictures?
• Asia: many countries (China, Indonesia, Israel) need sentences on the state of modern laws; others (e.g. Japan, Thailand) are decent but could realistically reach US/Canada-section levels with further work! :)
  • India: still need to add more post-ancient history, e.g. British hostility to hijras, modern-era laws.
  • Iran: add pre-modern history, modern transphobia, government forcing gay people into SRS.
  • Philippines: many Philippine articles on LGBT topics are poor, a result of persistent POV and/or poorly-sourced edits; this section needs checking, sourcing, and then expanding, etc.
  • add: Korea, Mongols + Mongolia, Pakistan, Palestine (today + pre-1900s), Vietnam.
• Australasia and Oceania: needs expansion of pre-modern history as well as modern laws.
• Europe:
  • Balkans: needs more countries' modern stuff.
  • France, UK, Russia, Spain: needs modern laws, etc (UK to mention media TERFs?).
  • Scandinavia: add (modern sterilization laws/repeals, etc)
  • mention other countries, e.g. Greece, Poland (incl. communist-era SRS), at least in a "General" section
• Antarctica: is there any serious content to add? (, ? Probably not...)
• Lead: is probably an adequate summary of the article now, but will need to be kept up with changes above!

-sche (talk) 00:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Struck out one more bit that's been done. -sche (talk) 23:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Just more approval for what you are doing; it isn’t passing unnoticed. The "Earliest history" subsections at the top of some of the major geo sections is a great way to handle this. (Although I’d go for "early" or "ancient"—if applicable—rather than a superlative,but that’s just a quibble.) Good job; thanks for your efforts. Mathglot (talk) 23:17, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! And that's a good suggestion; I've changed 'Earliest' to 'Early', except in Europe where 'Earliest history' contrasts with a following same-level 'Ancient' history section. Incidentally, I wonder if Africa should be reorganized said the Briton to the Frenchman in the 1800s. Maybe: Ancient Egypt, Arab Africa (including the bits on 10th to 18th century Egypt), and then the regions of Black Africa: East (including the non-Arab Nuba peoples who are currently kumped with Arabs in North Africa?), Central, West, and South. (If I could find reliable sources on a Phoenician/Carthaginian third gender I would add a section for it, but I haven't yet. Another thing I found claims of, including on some university webpages, but didn't find in sources directly about Madagascar or that I would consider reliable, is that the Sakalava or Tanala of Madagascar had a third gender for 'boys raised as girls'. I will try to check German and French language sources later.) -sche (talk) 17:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

• A recent (poor) edit to Transgender prompted me to look into the concept Shirabyōshi; I see some discussion of either the dancers or the deities of the same name as trans-gender figures, but would need to look into it further to determine if it's appropriate to add anything here or to that article. -sche (talk) 22:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

• On a procedural note, the first paragraph of the lead apart from the first sentence (i.e. the part from "As this history..." to "...and 'gender role'") is not "embodied"/reflected in the body; possibly the first body section should be something like "Scope and considerations" with a paragraph covering that ground; alternatively, perhaps slightly more content could be added, either to the relevant chronological places or to a section like "Development as a discipline", covering that ground. Something to mull over. -sche (talk) 22:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

In literature

Was thinking of adding a section In literature. Ovid has something in Metamorphoses; so does Montaigne. I hate "in pop culture" WP:TRIVIA sections, so I would strive to avoid that (no trans spongebob characters or Star Trek aliens, please) but serious cases like these, should be considered. Mathglot (talk) 00:03, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

I do think the most important pieces of literature (like the earliest or most influential records or 'explanations' or the like) warrant mention here, and a few are already mentioned—but they're in their chronological and geographic* places. I'm not immediately able to envision what advantages a section would offer over making an article specifically on the topic (Transgender people in literature? History of transgender topics in literature?) or sorting things into the existing structure, but that's arguably a sign you should go ahead and add (or mock up) what you're envisioning and then we could look at it and discuss whether it'd be best in that form, dispersed into the rest of the article, or split off into its own article. (This article is quite large.) (*A structure which I acknowledge is already bumping into some issues, like where to mention a pan-national and indeed somewhat pre-national religion's records and views...and I admit I can see how e.g. a Roman work with influence throughout Europe long after Rome's fall would present some of the same issues.) -sche (talk) 02:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Which transnational entries were you thinking of, specifically? If several are in different countries but one localized area, we could add section headers, eg Southwest Africa, or South Asia (hijra), or whatever made sense, and place the transnational items there (possibly under subheading “Regional”), followed by the country name section headers within the transnational region. Mathglot (talk) 23:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Two connected things I ran into were third-gender categories mentioned in early "Indian" and then Buddhist texts and practices (from India but also elsewhere) which have connections with hijras in various Indian subcontinent nations and kathoeys in Thailand (and among the Khmer at some points in history?). This is currently sort-of handled via an early-history "Buddhist Asia" section and later "Indian subcontinent" and (elsewhere) "Thailand" sections, with cross-links and a bit of repetition between them. Also tricky is the Byzantine Empire with history in Europe, Asia, and Africa. At the moment, I put it near the Ancient Rome section (in Europe) and left explicit links to there in the 'Asia' and 'Africa' sections. Modern Turkey and Egypt present a similar issue but in those cases I think it's fine to just sort all of Turkey into Asia and all of Egypt into Africa even if we ever have any e.g. Sinai-specific content. What to do about Ottoman content is another question (currently, the only explicitly Ottoman content was Egypt-specific so it's sorted with other Egyptian content, but there may be Asian and European content and indeed the sworn virgins have some connections to the Ottomans). Russia is also a frankensection: separating the "Indigenous peoples of the Far East" into a subsection is the obvious solution to half the problem, but the other half is what to call the other section / content, which isn't exactly about "European (portions of) Russia" but more "European(-led/oriented) Russia". -sche (talk) 19:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Peripheral things, if this page gets too large

If, as this page continues to be expanded, it is felt that it is too large, here are the first line of things I'd suggest could be moved to other articles because they're less vital / more peripheral to this topic. (Many but not all of these are things I've added...)

• eunuchs (move to Eunuch or other more specific articles), starting with Ottoman and Egyptian eunuchs (but preserving a link somewhere on this page to Eunuch)
• Romans' negative views of crossdressing (move to History of cross-dressing?)
• Lafitau quotes or whole paragraph (which are redundant to earlier and later statements that such roles existed)
• quotes from various courts about why they ruled
• Bata the Egyptian (move to Tale of Two Brothers), other Ancient Egyptian content
• La Fargue sentence (move to Canada-specific article like the next item below)
• less-important modern-era people, e.g. first trans gondolier in Venice or first trans hockey player, as long as the section has other modern-era content (in these cases: MPs and laws) (move to "LGBT (rights|history) in " pages)

And descriptions of other specific individuals could be condensed. (Alternatively, but IMO much less optimally, the page could be split by continent: Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa. However, the byte size of the prose itself is only ~57k; most of the bytes are references; so I would be averse to splitting it.) -sche (talk) 03:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Kaúxuma Núpika

I was in the middle of editing the Canada section, to add something like the following:

In the early 1800s, reports by a surveyor and Northwest Passage explorers of a "Manlike Woman" were circulated. They were about a person who lived at different times as a woman married to a man, and as a warrior who used bow and arrow in combat, and who died of a battle wound.

until I realized the atrocious state of referencing at the article, and decided it wasn't sufficiently supported. If this can be confirmed, it would make a good addition to this article. Note that the Kutenai straddle the CA-US border in the west. Mathglot (talk) 00:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

There's been no change to that article's sourcing since then. I may try to place feedback requests at some Project pages, to see if we can get that article in better shape, with a view to adding a sentence or two here about it. Mathglot (talk) 01:11, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

• Listed at: WT:LGBT, WT:Indigenous, WT:Canada. Mathglot (talk) 04:47, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

  Just on a procedural(?) level, would not the more logical place to discuss improving the article Kaúxuma Núpika be Talk:Kaúxuma Núpika? -sche (talk) 20:01, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Transgender people in Turkey

I noticed that Turkey wasn't included while there's a transgender singer from 1970s and some other transgender celebrities All cats are british (talk) 23:02, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Reactionary laws in Central/Eastern Europe

Hungary just passed a discriminatory, anti-LGBT law, and regions of Poland have had so-called, "LGBT-free zones" for some time. The Hungarian law may be too recent to cover here now, but we should keep an eye on it. While on that region, I notice we don't have much of anything on Central/Eastern Europe (I mean, former Warsaw Pact countries). The series of "LGBT rights in <country>" articles could be checked to see if there's anything going on that rises to the level of importance to be included here.

If we can figure out what to call it, maybe we can have a region subsection under #Europe, rather than individual country subsections, at least for starters. Pinging -sche for comments. Mathglot (talk) 19:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

The lead sentence has issues

The lead sentence says this

Transgender history, in the broadest sense, includes examples of gender variance and gender nonconformity in cultures worldwide since ancient times.

I haven't this article but transgender people are individuals who a gender identity different from there assigned sex. So I don't understand why gender nonconforming is mentioned in the lead.CycoMa (talk) 01:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Because of the sweep of history, and how things evolve. Ever hear of using cowrie shells as money? A history of world banking, might start with exchanging cowrie shells, or evaporated sea salt. A history of transgender people in the world, starts with the earliest known antecedents. Make sense now? In that sense, I think the lead sentence is just fine. Mathglot (talk) 06:34, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

I guess that makes sense, but the article doesn’t explain why gender nonconformity is important to transgender history. Like I tried scrolling through as much of the sources and the articles and it doesn’t explain why gender nonconformity is important to the history of transgender people.

But nonetheless this article mentions stuff that is unrelated to the topic of transgender history, like the section on Canada says this.

During the colonial period a European system of beliefs and values was imposed on the First Nations and enforced among the colonists. In 1738, the arrival of Esther Brandeau, a Jewish girl disguised as a boy using the male pseudonym Jacques La Fargue, caused a minor scandal in Quebec City.

Like in what way is a woman pretending to be a boy has to do with transgender history? I even checked the source cited for that sentence it doesn’t mention anything about transgender or LGBT.

This is also the case with Germany

Around 98 CE, at a time galli priests existed in Rome, Tacitus wrote that the priest of the Germanic Nahanarvali tribe also wore women's clothes.

Also I noticed the article mentions cases of intersex people. Sure some of the sources do mention that these cases have something to do with transgender people but in other cases they don’t.

CycoMa (talk) 06:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Like come on an average doesn’t know anything about transgender history. Don’t assume a reader is gonna instantly expect gender nonconformity and transgenderism have a connection.

A brief explanation for there connection would be nice.CycoMa (talk) 07:04, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

It seems worthwhile to look for how sources define this topic and go from there. Additionally, anything in the body whose source does not mention being transgender, specifically, should be removed as WP:SYNTH. Gender nonconformity is not necessarily transgender related. Through history there were reasons for people to cross-dress or present as the opposite gender (for lack of better terms) that were unrelated to gender identity as understood today. Any claim such cases are related has to be made by reliable sources, not Wikipedians. Crossroads 23:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Digging through the edit history, I found where this wording was introduced: diff, which changed the lead from "Transgender history begins with transgender (in the broad sense, including non-binary and third-gender) people " to the current "Transgender history, in the broadest sense, includes examples of gender variance and gender nonconformity in ancient cultures ". I am inclined to think the previous wording was more on-topic, and more in line with RS, which (as noted and cited in the main Transgender article) tend to define transgender, even "in the broadest sense", in terms of non-cisgender and non-binary / third-gender people (sometimes, when defining it very broadly indeed, some RS even include crossdressers) but not just any "gender variance and gender nonconformity". I would not object to simply restoring the original wording. -sche (talk) 19:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

I have changed it back, although further improvement may be possible. Crossroads 02:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

'Main' vs. 'Further' links in sections

In my opinion, sections with Summary style top-of-section links should only use the {{Main}} template when the target article is a history topic, such as in sections #Canada, #China, #South Africa, or #United States. OTOH, if the section top link is to a non-history topic, as in sections #Australia, #Haiti, or #Uruguay then they should use {{Further}} or {{See also}} instead.

To the extent that redirects exist with 'history' in the name I'd be okay with using a {{Main}} link in that case, even if the target article was currently not a 'history' article, but possibly a section-redirect to one of the 'LGBT rights in <country>' articles, because it could become a 'history' article in the future. (No such redirects currently exist afaik; but could apply to redirects such as Transgender history in Haiti, Transgender history in Uruguay, and so on.) User:-sche, any thoughts on this? Mathglot (talk) 02:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

• Listed at: Misplaced Pages talk:Summary style. Mathglot (talk) 02:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

I agree fundamentally with your view on the distinction, although I would strongly prefer {{see also}} to {{further}} in most cases here. My own use of {{Main}} is always restricted to cases where the section's explicit or implicit topic is exactly the target of the {{main}} link. — HTGS (talk) 06:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

I also support your recommendation for {{Main}}. I don't have an informed opinion on see also vs. further. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 06:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Meaning? David Reimer?

"In 1970, Dianna Boileau underwent sex reassignment surgery at Toronto General Hospital, becoming possibly the first in Canada to do so"

Does this reference to actual surgery in Canada or being the first Canadian? Because David Reimer had that surgery (technically) but at Hopkins in 1967. Also, I'm pretty sure they operated on boys with micropenises in Canada before 1970 no? Chronicler87 (talk) 13:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

==Wiki Education assignment: The Middle Ages== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bowmanbk (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Maescam.

The lead seems logic-less

"Transgender people (including non-binary and third gender individuals) have existed in cultures worldwide since ancient times. The modern terms and meanings of "transgender", "gender", "gender identity", and "gender role" only emerged in the 1950s and 1960s. As a result, opinions of how to categorize historical accounts of gender-variant people and identities vary."

Does anyone else see the problem here? There is dissent on how to categorize gender-variant personal identities and social roles throughout history. This article includes historical gender-variant identities and social roles, and counts them (in the lead's first sentence) as part of transgender history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isthistwisted (talk • contribs) 16:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

How about changing the beginning to "People with gender-variant identities have existed in cultures worldwide since ancient times. The modern terms and meanings of "transgender", "gender", "gender identity", and "gender role" only emerged in the 1950s and 1960s. As a result, opinions vary on how to categorize historical accounts of such people and identities."? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

That sounds like an improvement to me. Colin M (talk) 16:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

I have implemented the second change, but I disagree with changing the first sentence. The article is still about transgender folks, and sources describe it as transgender history. The third sentence is to express that there is scholarly disagreement, but the weight of sources cover transgender, not gender variant, history. CaptainEek ⚓ 18:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for implementing part of Fireandfeathers' suggestion; whoever they are I like their style! If it's a matter involved in scholarly disagreement, can we state one of the positions in wiki-voice? (I support the radical queering of history, but I'm trying to color inside the lines while I have my Wiki-hat on). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@Firefangledfeathers Hehe sorry I was typing your name from memory :P My concern is that we're giving undue weight to this disagreement. In fact, its hardly discussed in the article at present. Nor do I think the actual weight of the sources bear that argument out. I've been meaning to expand this article. I'll try to work on the historiography section some today and see where the sources lead me, and hopefully then we can have some more info to make a decision on :) CaptainEek ⚓ 18:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks cap'n. I don't think the status quo language is problematic enough that it requires immediate fixing. Happy to watch some WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY happen and I'll chip in where I can. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

The problem with the lead is a symptom of the POV of the whole page. For example treating eunuchs as though their decision to become eunuchs was an expression of their gender identity rather than a necessary sacrifice for advancement in the administrations of certain kingdoms. This page is reading back into history a very modern and western ideology.Dejvid (talk) 05:45, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• C-Class history articles
• High-importance history articles
• WikiProject History articles
• C-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
• WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
• C-Class Gender studies articles
• High-importance Gender studies articles
• WikiProject Gender studies articles
• C-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
• High-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
• WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
• C-Class fashion articles
• High-importance fashion articles
• C-Class sociology articles
• High-importance sociology articles
• Articles created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride 2016