Misplaced Pages

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (talk | contribs) at 21:18, 21 July 2022 (Fixed missing '#' in colour hex codes per AWB request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by me, for obvious reasons. J Milburn (talk) 20:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Igneuspentheism

Igneuspentheism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

My second made-up religion nomination for today. Delete. Blanchardb--timed 19:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable, no references, unencyclopedic, man I wish they had a speedy category for this kind of stuff... Icestorm815 (talk) 19:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I think db-group might apply. Regardless, no notability. Pharmboy (talk) 19:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Little or no value--NAHID 20:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete I was thinking db-web but db-group could work as well; this article is clearly not notable. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.