This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TTN (talk | contribs) at 22:58, 25 July 2022 (→Assassins in popular culture). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:58, 25 July 2022 by TTN (talk | contribs) (→Assassins in popular culture)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Assassins in popular culture
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Assassins in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly referenced "a list of depictions of the historical Assassins in later literature and modern popular culture", i.e. this is the usual list of media that mention the Order of Assassins. With trivia such as "MMORPGs have Assassins in them, referred in as a job or class", or "Corvo Attano from Dishonored is an assassin getting revenge on the people who conspired against him and framed him for murder", this mess fails WP:TRIVIA/WP:IPC, WP:NLIST, WP:GNG, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:OR. Further reading: WP:NOTTVTROPES. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Crime, Popular culture, Lists, and Middle East. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete pointless article with no clear topic— the supposed subject is oddly specific trivia while “assassins” in general are an extremely common topic in popular culture. Dronebogus (talk) 20:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - I'd imagine there's potential for some form of discussion on fictional interpretations of assassins, but this is not that topic. This is simply a trivial collection of minor details that cannot be improved in any capacity. It should be deleted, and someone should explore actual analysis of the topic in the main article if they have interest. TTN (talk) 22:58, 25 July 2022 (UTC)