This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SusanLesch (talk | contribs) at 00:23, 25 February 2007 (comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:23, 25 February 2007 by SusanLesch (talk | contribs) (comments)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)200+ Biography article assessments
Per a request a few hours ago, I banged out 200+ Biography assessments. -- Jreferee 01:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Criteria and articles with comments
Hi. I bumped into this page in my watchlist and wanted to suggest three things. One, the comments reviewers give editors are among the best things I have received from WikiProject Biography. Would it be possible to give people some idea of how to improve their articles? For Stub, and perhaps Start, a copy/paste of the steps to B class might work (I saw someone do this today and it worked well). For B and above more personalized comments might help. Second, could the criteria on which grading is done be part of "Instructions on how to assess a Biography article"? For example I am not sure that length is the sole difference between Stub and a Start (the quality scale says Stub is "either a very short article or a rough collection of information..."). Third, I would encourage use of the quality scale shared by all the projects (it does not forbid A class before GA, a rule that seems to have been introduced in this drive). Hope this helps. -Susanlesch 00:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)