This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Andrybak (talk | contribs) at 13:52, 2 September 2022 (→Template-protected edit request on 2 September 2022: Responded to edit request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:52, 2 September 2022 by Andrybak (talk | contribs) (→Template-protected edit request on 2 September 2022: Responded to edit request)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Weather: Tropical Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
Template-protected edit request on 11 April 2022
This edit request to Module:Storm categories/categories has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Given the concerns regarding the changed colors and their relation to the ongoing ArbCom case against WPTC regarding stealth canvassing (which the process was heavily tainted by) – brought up here, here and here (the last one brought up by me specifically to get more input from members) – I propose that until the ArbCom case is finalized on May 4 (under a month from now) the legacy colors be temporarily restored until a decision on what to do regarding the RfC’s outcomes is made. The reasoning behind this is mostly to fix the discrepancy between the infoboxes/timelines and the track maps themselves, given that the project was in the middle of re-discussing a new scheme after the previous consensus and had not updated the maps. Even now, currently active systems are still using the old color scale for the track maps so I think it is better that at least for the next month we follow that so as to not give confusion to new readers. This is a genuine concern and not a case of WP:IDLI as I am considering the ramifications the currently convoluted situation has right now on our new readers. MarioProtIV (/contribs) 15:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Please keep this to a single discussion where you initially posted. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Not done. We are not doing this. The proper process for an RfC is consensus first, then implementation of said consensus. In the meantime, the status quo should be upheld. It is far, far more disruptive to revert back and forth than it is to keep the current changes in place. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 19:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 2 September 2022
This edit request to Module:Storm categories/categories has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the icon for the "vstyphoon" category (around line 196):
name = "Very strong typhoon", sortkey = 60020, -- modified line (added comma) icon = "]" -- added line },
and the icon for the "vityphoon" category (around line 201):
color = "C464D9", name = "Violent typhoon", sortkey = 60030, -- modified line (added comma) icon = "]" -- added line },
Chlod (say hi!) 04:33, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Chlod, could you please clarify: after the proposed changes are applied, will the overrides from Special:Diff/1069592996/1107665379 need to be removed? —andrybak (talk) 07:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Andrybak: Well, they should be removed since an override would no longer be needed. It won't immediately break if there is a conflict. Chlod (say hi!) 07:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Done —andrybak (talk) 13:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)