This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pernambuco (talk | contribs) at 19:05, 2 March 2007 (keep, I am one of the established editors of that page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:05, 2 March 2007 by Pernambuco (talk | contribs) (keep, I am one of the established editors of that page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Classical homeopathy
- Classical homeopathy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Possible POV fork of Homeopathy, though, to be fair, there are strong opinions on Homeopathy, and it may just be that only one side edited it. However, in any case, the article admits the subject is almost undefinable as seperate to Homeopathy, except that it's somehow better than more general homeopathy. Should become a redirect, I think. Adam Cuerden 17:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- keep I am one of the editors of the page, it is an old page and it has been worked on by a lot of people, but it needs a major rewrite and it could also be shortened. There is a list of "To do" items in the article's talk page, this is a good start, I think, and I think everyone should read those before maing a decision here, but I will of course accept the decision of the majority and some of what Adam Cuerden says is also valid Pernambuco 19:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)